Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病健康男性运动后的炎症、血管修复及损伤反应:一项观察性研究

The inflammation, vascular repair and injury responses to exercise in fit males with and without Type 1 diabetes: an observational study.

作者信息

West Daniel J, Campbell Matthew D, Gonzalez Javier T, Walker Mark, Stevenson Emma J, Ahmed Fahad W, Wijaya Stephanie, Shaw James A, Weaver Jolanta U

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Jun 5;14:71. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0235-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes is associated with raised inflammation, impaired endothelial progenitor cell mobilisation and increased markers of vascular injury. Both acute and chronic exercise is known to influence these markers in non-diabetic controls, but limited data exists in Type 1 diabetes. We assessed inflammation, vascular repair and injury at rest and after exercise in physically-fit males with and without Type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Ten well-controlled type 1 diabetes (27 ± 2 years; BMI 24 ± 0.7 kg.m(2); HbA1c 53.3 ± 2.4 mmol/mol) and nine non-diabetic control males (27 ± 1 years; BMI 23 ± 0.8 kg.m(2)) matched for age, BMI and fitness completed 45-min of running. Venous blood samples were collected 60-min before and 60-min after exercise, and again on the following morning. Blood samples were processed for TNF-α using ELISA, and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs; CD45(dim)CD34(+)VEGFR2(+)) and endothelial cells (cECs; CD45(dim)CD133(-)CD34(+)CD144(+)) counts using flow-cytometry.

RESULTS

TNF-α concentrations were 4-fold higher at all-time points in Type 1 diabetes, when compared with control (P < 0.001). Resting cEPCs were similar between groups; after exercise there was a significant increase in controls (P = 0.016), but not in Type 1 diabetes (P = 0.202). CEPCs peaked the morning after exercise, with a greater change in controls vs. Type 1 diabetes (+139 % vs. 27 %; P = 0.01). CECs did not change with exercise and were similar between groups at all points (P > 0.05). Within the Type 1 diabetes group, the delta change in cEPCS from rest to the following morning was related to HbA1c (r = -0.65, P = 0.021) and TNF-α (r = -0.766, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Resting cEPCs and cECs in Type 1 diabetes patients with excellent HbA1c and high physical-fitness are comparable to healthy controls, despite eliciting 4-fold greater TNF-α. Furthermore, Type 1 diabetes patients appear to have a blunted post-exercise cEPCs response (vascular repair), whilst a biomarker of vascular injury (cECs) remained comparable to healthy controls.

摘要

背景

1型糖尿病与炎症加剧、内皮祖细胞动员受损以及血管损伤标志物增加有关。已知急性和慢性运动都会影响非糖尿病对照组中的这些标志物,但1型糖尿病患者的数据有限。我们评估了身体健康的1型糖尿病男性患者和非糖尿病男性患者在静息状态及运动后的炎症、血管修复和损伤情况。

方法

10名病情控制良好的1型糖尿病男性患者(年龄27±2岁;体重指数24±0.7kg/m²;糖化血红蛋白53.3±2.4mmol/mol)和9名年龄、体重指数及健康状况相匹配的非糖尿病对照男性(年龄27±1岁;体重指数23±0.8kg/m²)完成了45分钟的跑步。在运动前60分钟和运动后60分钟采集静脉血样,并于次日早晨再次采集。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测血样中的肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),并采用流式细胞术计数循环内皮祖细胞(cEPCs;CD45(dim)CD34(+)VEGFR2(+))和内皮细胞(cECs;CD45(dim)CD133(-)CD34(+)CD144(+))。

结果

与对照组相比,1型糖尿病患者在所有时间点的TNF-α浓度均高出4倍(P<0.001)。两组静息状态下的cEPCs相似;运动后,对照组的cEPCs显著增加(P=0.016),而1型糖尿病患者则无明显增加(P=0.202)。运动后次日早晨cEPCs达到峰值,对照组的变化幅度大于1型糖尿病患者(分别为增加139%和27%;P=0.01)。cECs在运动后未发生变化,且在所有时间点两组间均相似(P>0.05)。在1型糖尿病组中,cEPCs从静息状态到次日早晨的变化量与糖化血红蛋白(r=-0.65,P=0.021)和TNF-α(r=-0.766,P=0.005)相关。

结论

尽管糖化血红蛋白控制良好且身体健康的1型糖尿病患者的TNF-α水平高出4倍,但他们静息状态下的cEPCs和cECs与健康对照组相当。此外,1型糖尿病患者运动后的cEPCs反应(血管修复)似乎减弱,而血管损伤生物标志物(cECs)仍与健康对照组相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e2/4460651/3c9974f2eba4/12933_2015_235_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验