Cox R H
Psychomotor Division, Human Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0280.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Dec;60(12):1153-6.
Subjects for this research were 153 prospective pilots who were tested on computerized versions of the Two Hand Coordination (2HC) and Complex Coordination (CC) psychomotor tests. Independent variables included five basic error scores associated with the two psychomotor tests. The criterion for pilot performance was conceptualized as a function of the number of flying hours required to graduate from Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPTFLY). Results of MANOVA and multiple regression analyses revealed that performance on the two psychomotor tests was significantly related to the criterion for pilot performance (UPTFLY). The multiple regression analysis resulted in 27.1% of the variability of UPTFLY being accounted for by psychomotor performance. When the data were reanalyzed using a pass/fail UPT criterion the variability accounted for remained high, suggesting an anomaly associated with sample selection. Undergraduate pilot training outcome (pass/fail) remains the most valid criterion for Undergraduate Pilot Training success.
本研究的受试者为153名未来飞行员，他们接受了双手协调（2HC）和复杂协调（CC）心理运动测试的计算机化版本测试。自变量包括与这两项心理运动测试相关的五个基本错误分数。飞行员表现的标准被概念化为从本科飞行员训练毕业所需飞行小时数（UPTFLY）的函数。多变量方差分析（MANOVA）和多元回归分析的结果表明，两项心理运动测试的表现与飞行员表现标准（UPTFLY）显著相关。多元回归分析结果显示，心理运动表现解释了UPTFLY变异的27.1%。当使用通过/未通过的UPT标准重新分析数据时，所解释的变异仍然很高，这表明与样本选择有关的异常情况。本科飞行员训练结果（通过/未通过）仍然是本科飞行员训练成功的最有效标准。
