Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 5;11:288. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00288. eCollection 2020.
Acarbose and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) have several similarities regarding their efficacy. Assessing the hypoglycemic and weight-loss effects, as well as the tolerability between them at their optimal dosages, could provide a better management of adult type 2 diabetics. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) on randomized controlled trials that were identified from the databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, and SinoMed. The trials with 300 mg/day of acarbose or the recommended doses of DPP-4is were the most optimal for our NMA. The mean differences (MD) and relative risk (RR) derived from eligible studies were used. Among the 15,411 obtained potential studies, 13 pair-wise trials and 48 monotherapy studies were included in the meta-analysis and NMA, respectively. DPP-4is had a greater glucose-lowering effect, but a weaker weight-loss effect than acarbose in pair-wise meta-analysis ( < 0.05). However, NMA with 11,877 participants showed that, at their optimal doses, acarbose and DPP-4is had similar glucose-lowering effects on the 2-h postprandial glucose (MD 0.96 mmol/L, 95% credible interval -0.56 to 2.54), HbA1c (0.05%, -0.25 to 0.33), fasting plasma glucose reductions (-0.27 mmol/L, -0.76 to 0.24), and HbA1c < 7.0% target goal achievement (RR 1.33, 0.51 to 3.64). Acarbose was superior to DPP-4is regarding weight loss (MD -1.23 kg, -2.08 to -0.33). Acarbose had more withdrawal, gastrointestinal, and overall adverse events than DPP-4is ( < 0.05), but the differences disappeared after longer treatment ( > 0.05). Acarbose and DPP-4is have similar glucose-lowering effects, but the weight-loss effects of acarbose are superior. Therefore, in the use of the most optimal dosages, overweight/obese type 2 diabetics might benefit more from a treatment with acarbose than DPP-4is.
阿卡波糖和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP-4is)在疗效方面有几个相似之处。评估它们在最佳剂量下的降血糖和减肥效果以及耐受性,可以为成人 2 型糖尿病的治疗提供更好的管理。
我们对从 EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心、Web of Science、会议论文引文索引、ClinicalTrials.gov、中国国家知识基础设施、万方和 SinoMed 数据库中识别出的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。阿卡波糖的 300mg/天或 DPP-4is 的推荐剂量是我们 NMA 中最理想的剂量。合格研究中得出的平均值差异(MD)和相对风险(RR)用于分析。
在获得的 15411 项潜在研究中,13 项配对试验和 48 项单药治疗研究分别纳入了荟萃分析和 NMA。在配对荟萃分析中,DPP-4is 具有更大的降血糖作用,但与阿卡波糖相比,减肥作用较弱(<0.05)。然而,对 11877 名参与者进行的 NMA 显示,在最佳剂量下,阿卡波糖和 DPP-4is 对餐后 2 小时血糖(MD0.96mmol/L,95%可信区间-0.56 至 2.54)、糖化血红蛋白(0.05%,-0.25 至 0.33)、空腹血糖降低(-0.27mmol/L,-0.76 至 0.24)和糖化血红蛋白<7.0%目标达成率(RR1.33,0.51 至 3.64)具有相似的降糖效果。阿卡波糖在减肥方面优于 DPP-4is(MD-1.23kg,-2.08 至-0.33)。阿卡波糖比 DPP-4is 有更多的停药、胃肠道和整体不良事件(<0.05),但在更长的治疗时间后(>0.05)这些差异消失。
阿卡波糖和 DPP-4is 具有相似的降血糖效果,但阿卡波糖的减肥效果更好。因此,在使用最佳剂量时,超重/肥胖的 2 型糖尿病患者可能从阿卡波糖治疗中获益更多,而不是 DPP-4is。