Lavelle William F, Mroz Thomas, Lieberman Isador
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, East Syracuse, NY.
Center for Spine Health, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Apr 29;9:12. doi: 10.14444/2012. eCollection 2015.
The purpose of this study was to determine the use of Central Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Selective Nerve Root Blocks (SNRB) along with the crossover rate to lumbar discectomy in patients with a lumbar disc herniation using retrospective records database search. Butterman et al found a crossover rate for patients with symptomatic disc herniations treated with ESI of 54% (27/50), while Riew similarly found a 53% (29/55) crossover patients receiving SNRB.
The database was searched in a sequential Boolean style for patients with the diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation (Displaced Lumbar Disc - 722.1) and a SNRB (64483) or ESI (62311) who subsequently underwent a Lumbar Discectomy (63030) over a three year time period from January 2004 through December 2006. Statistical analysis was preformed examining the impact of injection type, age, location, gender, and year.
Of 482,893 patients with the diagnosis of a disc herniation, 27,799(5.76%) underwent a lumbar discectomy. The 29,941 patients who received at least one SNRB for a disc herniation, 10.80% later underwent a lumbar discectomy. The 41,420 patients who received at least one ESI for a disc herniation 9.34% later underwent a lumbar discectomy. There was a noted increase in injection procedures, particularly SNRB during the study with a greater than 50% increase.
Our examination found a much smaller, but similar crossover rate to surgery between both injection methods, which argues against one method being more effective than another in avoiding surgery. It is likely that patients are receiving these procedures more frequently during the course of conservative treatment for a disc herniation.
This was a Level III study.
本研究旨在通过回顾性记录数据库搜索,确定腰椎间盘突出症患者使用硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)和选择性神经根阻滞(SNRB)的情况以及转为腰椎间盘切除术的交叉率。巴特曼等人发现,接受ESI治疗的有症状椎间盘突出症患者的交叉率为54%(27/50),而里夫同样发现接受SNRB治疗的患者中有53%(29/55)转为手术治疗。
从2004年1月至2006年12月的三年时间里,以顺序布尔方式在数据库中搜索诊断为腰椎间盘突出症(移位型腰椎间盘 - 722.1)且接受过SNRB(64483)或ESI(62311)并随后接受腰椎间盘切除术(63030)的患者。进行统计分析以检验注射类型、年龄、部位、性别和年份的影响。
在482,893例诊断为椎间盘突出症的患者中,27,799例(5.76%)接受了腰椎间盘切除术。29,941例因椎间盘突出症接受至少一次SNRB治疗的患者中,10.80%后来接受了腰椎间盘切除术。41,420例因椎间盘突出症接受至少一次ESI治疗的患者中,9.34%后来接受了腰椎间盘切除术。在研究期间,注射治疗程序有明显增加,尤其是SNRB,增加幅度超过50%。
我们的研究发现,两种注射方法转为手术治疗的交叉率虽小但相似,这表明在避免手术方面,一种方法并不比另一种方法更有效。在椎间盘突出症的保守治疗过程中,患者可能更频繁地接受这些治疗程序。
这是一项III级研究。