• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试与慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议患者类型的评估:一项横断面分析

Evaluation of the COPD Assessment Test and GOLD patient types: a cross-sectional analysis.

作者信息

Lopez-Campos Jose Luis, Fernandez-Villar Alberto, Calero-Acuña Carmen, Represas-Represas Cristina, Lopez-Ramírez Cecilia, Fernández Virginia Leiro, Soler-Cataluña Juan Jose, Casamor Ricard

机构信息

Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain ; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Servicio de Neumología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Vigo (IBIV), Complexo Hospitalario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 May 27;10:975-84. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82781. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S82781
PMID:26064045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4455854/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) has been recently developed to quantify COPD impact in routine practice. However, no relationship with other measures in the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy has been evaluated. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship of the CAT with other GOLD multidimensional axes, patient types, and the number of comorbidities.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (On-Sint) study. The CAT score was administered to all participants at the inclusion visit. A GOLD 2011 strategy consisting of modified Medical Research Council scale (MRC) scores was devised to study the relationship between the CAT, and GOLD 2011 axes and patient types. The relationship with comorbidities was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index, grouped as zero, one to two, and three or more.

RESULTS

The CAT questionnaire was completed by 1,212 patients with COPD. The CAT maintained a relationship with all the three axes, with a ceiling effect for dyspnea and no distinction between mild and moderate functional impairment. The CAT score increased across GOLD 2011 patient types A-D, with similar scores for types B and C. Within each GOLD 2011 patient type, there was a considerably wide distribution of CAT values.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates a correlation between CAT and the GOLD 2011 classification axes as well as the number of comorbidities. The CAT score can help clinicians, as a complementary tool to evaluate patients with COPD within the different GOLD patient types.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)最近已被开发出来,用于在日常实践中量化慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的影响。然而,尚未评估其与慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)策略中其他指标的关系。本研究旨在评估CAT与GOLD其他多维指标、患者类型及合并症数量之间的关系。

方法

这是一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床表现、诊断及病程(On-Sint)研究的横断面分析。在纳入研究时,对所有参与者进行CAT评分。制定了一个由改良的医学研究委员会量表(MRC)评分组成的GOLD 2011策略,以研究CAT与GOLD 2011指标及患者类型之间的关系。使用Charlson合并症指数评估与合并症的关系,分为无、一至两种以及三种或更多。

结果

1212例COPD患者完成了CAT问卷调查。CAT与所有三个指标均有关系,呼吸困难存在天花板效应,轻度和中度功能障碍之间无差异。CAT评分在GOLD 2011的A - D型患者中逐渐升高,B型和C型患者评分相似。在每种GOLD 2011患者类型中,CAT值分布相当广泛。

结论

我们的研究表明CAT与GOLD 2011分类指标以及合并症数量之间存在相关性。CAT评分可作为一种辅助工具,帮助临床医生评估不同GOLD患者类型中的COPD患者。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the COPD Assessment Test and GOLD patient types: a cross-sectional analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试与慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议患者类型的评估:一项横断面分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 May 27;10:975-84. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82781. eCollection 2015.
2
Discrepancies between modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score and COPD assessment test score in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分与COPD评估测试评分之间的差异
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Aug 12;10:1623-31. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S87147. eCollection 2015.
3
Application of the new GOLD COPD staging system to a US primary care cohort, with comparison to physician and patient impressions of severity.将新的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)全球倡议(GOLD)分期系统应用于美国基层医疗队列,并与医生和患者对严重程度的印象进行比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jul 30;10:1477-86. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S78827. eCollection 2015.
4
Modified Medical Research Council scale vs Baseline Dyspnea Index to evaluate dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.改良医学研究委员会量表与基线呼吸困难指数用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的呼吸困难
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Aug 18;10:1663-72. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82408. eCollection 2015.
5
Epidemiology, severity, and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United Kingdom by GOLD 2013.英国慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行病学、严重程度及治疗(依据2013年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议)
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 May 13;10:925-37. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82064. eCollection 2015.
6
The effect of comorbidities on COPD assessment: a pilot study.合并症对慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估的影响:一项试点研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 25;10:429-38. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S76124. eCollection 2015.
7
Comparison between COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores for evaluation of clinical symptoms, comorbidities and medical resources utilization in COPD patients.COPD 评估测试(CAT)与改良版医学研究理事会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)在 COPD 患者临床症状、合并症及医疗资源利用评估方面的比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 3):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
8
Comorbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Related to disease severity?慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的合并症。与疾病严重程度有关吗?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Nov 19;9:1307-14. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S71849. eCollection 2014.
9
2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease reclassifies half of COPD subjects to lower risk group.2017年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议将一半的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者重新分类到低风险组。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jan 3;13:165-173. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S151016. eCollection 2018.
10
Factors responsible for poor sleep quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者睡眠质量差的相关因素。
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 8;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0281-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Literature Review of the Humanistic Burden of COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病人文负担的系统文献回顾。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 May 10;16:1303-1314. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S296696. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictors of Symptom Burden in Patients with COPD on LAMA Monotherapy: Multivariable Analysis of a Claims-Linked Survey Study.接受长效抗胆碱能药物单药治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者症状负担的预测因素:一项与索赔相关的调查研究的多变量分析
Pulm Ther. 2019 Dec;5(2):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s41030-019-00098-1. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
COPD beyond proximal bronchial obstruction: phenotyping and related tools at the bedside.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with inadequate diagnosis of COPD: On-Sint cohort analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断不足的相关因素:On-Sint队列分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 May 18;10:961-7. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S79547. eCollection 2015.
2
The COPD assessment test: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试:系统评价。
Eur Respir J. 2014 Oct;44(4):873-84. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00025214. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Real-world characterization and differentiation of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy classification.
COPD 超越近端支气管阻塞:表型与床边相关工具。
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Jul 8;28(152). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0010-2019. Print 2019 Jun 30.
4
Degree of control of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Spain: SINCON study.西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的控制程度:SINCON 研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0749-7.
5
Community Assessment of COPD Health Care (COACH) study: a clinical audit on primary care performance variability in COPD care.社区慢性阻塞性肺疾病健康评估(COACH)研究:初级保健中慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理绩效变异性的临床审计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0528-4.
6
Evaluation of symptomatic patients without airflow obstruction: back to the future.对无气流阻塞的症状性患者的评估:回归未来。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Dec;8(12):E1657-E1660. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.103.
7
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with impaired disease control in asthma-COPD overlap syndrome patients.维生素D缺乏与哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征患者疾病控制不佳有关。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Sep 24;10:2017-25. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S91654. eCollection 2015.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议策略分类的真实世界特征与区分
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 May 28;9:551-61. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S62104. eCollection 2014.
4
Moving towards patient-centered medicine for COPD management: multidimensional approaches versus phenotype-based medicine--a critical view.迈向以患者为中心的慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理:多维方法与基于表型的医学——批判性观点
COPD. 2014 Sep;11(5):591-602. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.898035. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
Sensitivity of the COPD assessment test (CAT questionnaire) investigated in a population of 681 consecutive patients referring to a lung clinic: the first Italian specific study.在一家肺科诊所连续就诊的681名患者群体中对慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT问卷)的敏感性进行调查:意大利的首个专项研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014 Mar 15;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-9-15.
6
Questionnaires in multidimensional assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two sides of the same coin.
Arch Bronconeumol. 2014 Jul;50(7):265-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
7
Clinical application of the COPD assessment test: longitudinal data from the COPD History Assessment in Spain (CHAIN) cohort.COPD 评估测试的临床应用:来自西班牙 COPD 病史评估(CHAIN)队列的纵向数据。
Chest. 2014 Jul;146(1):111-122. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2246.
8
Spanish guideline for COPD (GesEPOC). Update 2014.西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病指南(GesEPOC)。2014年更新版。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2014 Jan;50 Suppl 1:1-16. doi: 10.1016/S0300-2896(14)70070-5.
9
Analysis of comorbid factors that increase the COPD assessment test scores.分析增加 COPD 评估测试评分的合并症因素。
Respir Res. 2014 Feb 6;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-13.
10
The COPD assessment test (CAT) assists prediction of COPD exacerbations in high-risk patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)有助于预测高危患者的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重情况。
Respir Med. 2014 Apr;108(4):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jan 6.