Neal Sarah, Channon Andrew Amos, Carter Sarah, Falkingham Jane
Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Building 58, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
ESRC Centre for Population Change, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Jun 16;14:56. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0184-9.
The drive toward universal health coverage (UHC) is central to the post 2015 agenda, and is incorporated as a target in the new Sustainable Development Goals. However, it is recognised that an equity dimension needs to be included when progress to this goal is monitored. WHO have developed a monitoring framework which proposes a target of 80% coverage for all populations regardless of income and place of residence by 2030, and this paper examines the feasibility of this target in relation to antenatal care and skilled care at delivery.
We analyse the coverage gap between the poorest and richest groups within the population for antenatal care and presence of a skilled attendant at birth for countries grouped by overall coverage of each maternal health service. Average annual rates of improvement needed for each grouping (disaggregated by wealth quintile and urban/rural residence) to reach the goal are also calculated, alongside rates of progress over the past decades for comparative purposes.
Marked inequities are seen in all groups except in countries where overall coverage is high. As the monitoring framework has an absolute target countries with currently very low coverage are required to make rapid and sustained progress, in particular for the poorest and those living in rural areas. The rate of past progress will need to be accelerated markedly in most countries if the target is to be achieved, although several countries have demonstrated the rate of progress required is feasible both for the population as a whole and for the poorest.
For countries with currently low coverage the target of 80% essential coverage for all populations will be challenging. Lessons should be drawn from countries who have achieved rapid and equitable progress in the past.
实现全民健康覆盖是2015年后议程的核心,并已被纳入新的可持续发展目标之中。然而,人们认识到,在监测这一目标的进展情况时,需要纳入公平维度。世界卫生组织制定了一个监测框架,该框架提出到2030年所有人群(无论收入和居住地)的覆盖率达到80%的目标,本文探讨了这一目标在产前护理和分娩时的熟练护理方面的可行性。
我们分析了按每项孕产妇保健服务的总体覆盖率分组的国家中,最贫困和最富裕群体在产前护理以及分娩时有熟练护理人员在场方面的覆盖率差距。还计算了每个分组(按财富五分位数和城乡居住地细分)为实现该目标所需的年平均改善率,以及过去几十年的进展率以供比较。
除了总体覆盖率高的国家外,在所有群体中都存在明显的不平等现象。由于监测框架有一个绝对目标,目前覆盖率非常低的国家需要迅速并持续取得进展,特别是对于最贫困群体和农村地区居民而言。如果要实现这一目标,大多数国家过去的进展速度将需要显著加快,尽管有几个国家已经证明,对于全体人口以及最贫困群体而言,所需的进展速度是可行的。
对于目前覆盖率较低的国家来说,所有人群80%基本覆盖率的目标将具有挑战性。应该借鉴过去在实现快速和公平进展方面取得成功的国家的经验教训。