Mitselos Ioannis V, Christodoulou Dimitrios K, Katsanos Konstantinos H, Tsianos Epameinondas V
Ioannis V Mitselos, Dimitrios K Christodoulou, Konstantinos H Katsanos, Epameinondas V Tsianos, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jun 10;7(6):643-51. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i6.643.
The introduction of wireless capsule endoscopy in 2000 has revolutionized our ability to visualize parts of the small bowel mucosa classically unreached by the conventional endoscope, and since the recent introduction of colon capsule endoscopy, a promising alternative method has been available for the evaluation of large bowel mucosa. The advantages of wireless capsule endoscopy include its non-invasive character and its ability to visualize proximal and distal parts of the intestine, while important disadvantages include the procedure's inability of tissue sampling and significant incompletion rate. Its greatest limitation is the prohibited use in cases of known or suspected stenosis of the intestinal lumen due to high risk of retention. Wireless capsule endoscopy plays an important role in the early recognition of recurrence, on Crohn's disease patients who have undergone ileocolonic resection for the treatment of Crohn's disease complications, and in patients' management and therapeutic strategy planning, before obvious clinical and laboratory relapse. Although capsule endoscopy cannot replace traditional endoscopy, it offers valuable information on the evaluation of intestinal disease and has a significant impact on disease reclassification of patients with a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or inflammatory bowel disease unclassified/indeterminate colitis. Moreover, it may serve as an effective alternative where colonoscopy is contraindicated and in cases with incomplete colonoscopy studies. The use of patency capsule maximizes safety and is advocated in cases of suspected small or large bowel stenosis.
2000年无线胶囊内镜的引入彻底改变了我们可视化传统内镜通常无法到达的小肠黏膜部分的能力,并且自从最近结肠胶囊内镜问世以来,一种有前景的替代方法可用于评估大肠黏膜。无线胶囊内镜的优点包括其非侵入性特点以及可视化肠道近端和远端部分的能力,而重要的缺点包括该检查无法进行组织采样以及显著的未完成率。其最大的局限性是由于滞留风险高,禁止在已知或疑似肠腔狭窄的病例中使用。无线胶囊内镜在对因克罗恩病并发症接受回结肠切除术的克罗恩病患者复发的早期识别中,以及在明显的临床和实验室复发之前的患者管理和治疗策略规划中发挥着重要作用。虽然胶囊内镜不能替代传统内镜,但它在肠道疾病评估中提供了有价值的信息,并且对先前诊断为溃疡性结肠炎或未分类/不确定结肠炎的炎症性肠病患者的疾病重新分类有重大影响。此外,在结肠镜检查禁忌和结肠镜检查不完全的情况下,它可作为一种有效的替代方法。使用通畅性胶囊可最大限度地提高安全性,并且在疑似小肠或大肠狭窄的病例中提倡使用。