Hoeboer Sandra H, Groeneveld A B Johan, van der Heijden Melanie, Oudemans-van Straaten Heleen M
Department of intensive care of Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, s-Gravendijkwal 230; 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of intensive care of VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Biomark Med. 2015;9(6):605-16. doi: 10.2217/bmm.15.15.
Accurate biomarkers of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may help risk stratification and management. We assessed the relation between several biomarkers and the severity, course and outcome of late onset ARDS in 101 consecutive critically ill patients with new onset fever.
On study days 0, 1, 2 and 7 we measured angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), pentraxin-3 (PTX3), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and midregional proadrenomedullin (proADM). ARDS was defined by the Berlin definition and by the lung injury score (LIS).
At baseline, 48% had ARDS according to the Berlin definition and 86% according to the LIS. Baseline markers poorly predicted maximum Berlin categories attained within 7 days, whereas ANG2 best predicted maximum LIS. Depending on the ARDS definition, the day-by-day area under the receiver operating characteristic curves suggested greatest monitoring value for IL-6 and PCT, followed by ANG2. ANG2 and proADM predicted outcome, independently of disease severity.
Whereas IL-6 and PCT had some disease monitoring value, ANG2 was the only biomarker capable of both predicting the severity, monitoring the course and predicting the outcome of late onset ARDS in febrile critically ill patients, irrespective of underlying risk factor, thereby yielding the most specific ARDS biomarker among those studied.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的准确生物标志物可能有助于风险分层和管理。我们评估了101例连续新发发热的危重症患者中几种生物标志物与迟发性ARDS严重程度、病程及预后的关系。
在研究的第0、1、2和7天,我们检测了血管生成素-2(ANG2)、五聚素-3(PTX3)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)和中段肾上腺髓质素原(proADM)。ARDS根据柏林定义和肺损伤评分(LIS)进行定义。
基线时,根据柏林定义48%的患者患有ARDS,根据LIS则为86%。基线标志物对7天内达到的最大柏林分级预测不佳,而ANG2对最大LIS的预测最佳。根据ARDS定义,每日受试者操作特征曲线下面积显示IL-6和PCT的监测价值最大,其次是ANG2。ANG2和proADM可独立于疾病严重程度预测预后。
尽管IL-6和PCT具有一定的疾病监测价值,但ANG2是唯一一种能够预测发热危重症患者迟发性ARDS的严重程度、监测病程并预测预后的生物标志物,无论潜在风险因素如何,因此是所研究生物标志物中最具特异性的ARDS生物标志物。