Suppr超能文献

使用基线系列香料标记物的斑贴试验结果——欧洲接触性过敏监测系统(ESSCA)网络2009 - 2012年分析

Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012.

作者信息

Frosch Peter J, Duus Johansen Jeanne, Schuttelaar Marie-Louise A, Silvestre Juan F, Sánchez-Pérez Javier, Weisshaar Elke, Uter Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448, Witten, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, Klinikum Dortmund, 44137, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Sep;73(3):163-71. doi: 10.1111/cod.12420. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact allergy to fragrances is common, and impairs quality of life, particularly in young women.

OBJECTIVE

To provide current results on the prevalences of sensitization to fragrance allergens used as markers in the baseline series of most European countries.

METHODS

Data of patients consecutively patch tested between 2009 and 2012 in 12 European countries with fragrance allergens contained in the baseline series were collected by the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies network and descriptively analysed. Four departments used the TRUE Test(®) system.

RESULTS

The 'basic markers' were tested on 51 477 [fragrance mix II (FM II)] to 57 123 [Myroxylon pereirae, balsam of Peru] patients, and yielded positive reactions as follows: fragrance mix I 6.9%, Myroxylon pereirae 5.4%, FM II 3.8%, colophonium 2.6%, and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde 1.7%, with some regional differences. Prevalences with TRUE Test(®) allergens were lower. Additional fragrances were tested on 3643 (trimethylbenzenepropanol) to 14 071 (oil of turpentine) patients, and yielded between 2.6% (Cananga odorata) and 0.7% (trimethylbenzenepropanol) positive reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Contact allergy to fragrances is common throughout Europe, with regional variation probably being explained by patch test technique, and differences in exposure and referral patterns. The current basic markers of fragrance sensitivity in the baseline series should be supplemented with additional fragrance allergens.

摘要

背景

对香料的接触性过敏很常见,会损害生活质量,尤其是在年轻女性中。

目的

提供大多数欧洲国家基线系列中用作标记物的香料过敏原致敏率的当前结果。

方法

欧洲接触性过敏监测系统网络收集了2009年至2012年期间在12个欧洲国家对基线系列中所含香料过敏原进行连续斑贴试验的患者数据,并进行了描述性分析。四个部门使用了TRUE Test(®)系统。

结果

对51477名[香料混合物II(FM II)]至57123名[秘鲁香脂,秘鲁胶]患者进行了“基本标记物”测试,阳性反应如下:香料混合物I为6.9%,秘鲁香脂为5.4%,FM II为3.8%,松香为2.6%,羟基异己基3-环己烯甲醛为1.7%,存在一些地区差异。TRUE Test(®)过敏原的致敏率较低。对3643名(三甲基苯丙醇)至14071名(松节油)患者进行了其他香料测试,阳性反应率在2.6%(依兰油)至0.7%(三甲基苯丙醇)之间。

结论

在整个欧洲,对香料的接触性过敏很常见,地区差异可能由斑贴试验技术、接触和转诊模式的差异来解释。基线系列中当前的香料敏感性基本标记物应补充其他香料过敏原。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验