Suppr超能文献

英格兰和威尔士健康研究获取个人机密数据:评估公众对理想同意模式和可接受同意模式态度上的差距。

Health research access to personal confidential data in England and Wales: assessing any gap in public attitude between preferable and acceptable models of consent.

作者信息

Taylor Mark J, Taylor Natasha

机构信息

School of Law, Bartolomé House, The University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield, S3 7ND, UK,

出版信息

Life Sci Soc Policy. 2014 Dec;10:15. doi: 10.1186/s40504-014-0015-6. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

Abstract

England and Wales are moving toward a model of 'opt out' for use of personal confidential data in health research. Existing research does not make clear how acceptable this move is to the public. While people are typically supportive of health research, when asked to describe the ideal level of control there is a marked lack of consensus over the preferred model of consent (e.g. explicit consent, opt out etc.). This study sought to investigate a relatively unexplored difference between the consent model that people prefer and that which they are willing to accept. It also sought to explore any reasons for such acceptance.A mixed methods approach was used to gather data, incorporating a structured questionnaire and in-depth focus group discussions led by an external facilitator. The sampling strategy was designed to recruit people with different involvement in the NHS but typically with experience of NHS services. Three separate focus groups were carried out over three consecutive days.The central finding is that people are typically willing to accept models of consent other than that which they would prefer. Such acceptance is typically conditional upon a number of factors, including: security and confidentiality, no inappropriate commercialisation or detrimental use, transparency, independent overview, the ability to object to any processing considered to be inappropriate or particularly sensitive.This study suggests that most people would find research use without the possibility of objection to be unacceptable. However, the study also suggests that people who would prefer to be asked explicitly before data were used for purposes beyond direct care may be willing to accept an opt out model of consent if the reasons for not seeking explicit consent are accessible to them and they trust that data is only going to be used under conditions, and with safeguards, that they would consider to be acceptable even if not preferable.

摘要

英格兰和威尔士正朝着在健康研究中使用个人机密数据的“选择退出”模式发展。现有研究并未明确此举在公众中可接受的程度。虽然人们通常支持健康研究,但当被要求描述理想的控制水平时,对于首选的同意模式(例如明确同意、选择退出等)明显缺乏共识。本研究旨在调查人们偏好的同意模式与他们愿意接受的同意模式之间相对未被探索的差异。它还试图探究这种接受的任何原因。采用了混合方法来收集数据,包括一份结构化问卷以及由外部主持人主持的深入焦点小组讨论。抽样策略旨在招募在国民保健制度(NHS)中有不同参与度但通常有NHS服务经历的人群。连续三天进行了三个独立的焦点小组讨论。核心发现是,人们通常愿意接受除他们偏好的模式之外的同意模式。这种接受通常取决于一些因素,包括:安全和保密性、不存在不适当的商业化或有害用途、透明度、独立审查、能够反对任何被认为不适当或特别敏感的处理。本研究表明,大多数人会认为无法反对的研究用途是不可接受的。然而,该研究还表明,那些希望在数据被用于直接护理之外的目的之前被明确询问的人,如果他们能够了解不寻求明确同意的原因,并且他们相信数据只会在他们认为即使不是最理想但也可接受的条件和保障措施下被使用,那么他们可能愿意接受选择退出的同意模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ca7/4648851/59e8ca75da19/40504_2014_15_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验