Martínez-López Joaquín, Paiva Bruno, López-Anglada Lucía, Mateos María-Victoria, Cedena Teresa, Vidríales María-Belén, Sáez-Gómez María Auxiliadora, Contreras Teresa, Oriol Albert, Rapado Inmaculada, Teruel Ana-Isabel, Cordón Lourdes, Blanchard María Jesús, Bengoechea Enrique, Palomera Luis, de Arriba Felipe, Cueto-Felgueroso Cecilia, Orfao Alberto, Bladé Joan, San Miguel Jesús F, Lahuerta Juan José
Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain;
Hematology Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Medica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain;
Blood. 2015 Aug 13;126(7):858-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-638742. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
Stringent complete response (sCR) criteria are used in multiple myeloma as a deeper response category compared with CR, but prospective validation is lacking, it is not always clear how evaluation of clonality is performed, and is it not known what the relative clinical influence is of the serum free light chain ratio (sFLCr) and bone marrow (BM) clonality to define more sCR. To clarify this controversy, we focused on 94 patients that reached CR, of which 69 (73%) also fulfilled the sCR criteria. Patients with sCR displayed slightly longer time to progression (median, 62 vs 53 months, respectively; P = .31). On analyzing this contribution to the prognosis of sFLCr or clonality, it was found that the sFLCr does not identify patients in CR at distinct risk; by contrast, low-sensitive multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping (2 colors), which is equivalent to immunohistochemistry, identifies a small number of patients (5 cases) with high residual tumor burden and dismal outcome; nevertheless, using traditional 4-color MFC, persistent clonal BM disease was detectable in 36% of patients, who, compared with minimal residual disease-negative cases, had a significantly inferior outcome. These results show that the current definition of sCR should be revised.
与完全缓解(CR)相比,严格完全缓解(sCR)标准在多发性骨髓瘤中作为一种更深层次的缓解类别使用,但缺乏前瞻性验证,克隆性评估的具体方式并不总是明确,血清游离轻链比值(sFLCr)和骨髓(BM)克隆性对定义更多sCR的相对临床影响也不清楚。为了澄清这一争议,我们聚焦于94例达到CR的患者,其中69例(73%)也符合sCR标准。sCR患者的疾病进展时间略长(中位数分别为62个月和53个月;P = 0.31)。在分析sFLCr或克隆性对预后的影响时,发现sFLCr无法识别处于不同风险的CR患者;相比之下,等同于免疫组织化学的低敏感性多参数流式细胞术(MFC)免疫表型分析(2色)可识别出少数残留肿瘤负荷高且预后不良的患者(5例);然而,使用传统的4色MFC,36%的患者可检测到持续性克隆性BM疾病,与微小残留病阴性的病例相比,这些患者的预后明显较差。这些结果表明,目前sCR的定义应予以修订。