修复由美国国立卫生研究院资助的生物医学研究事业。
Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise.
作者信息
Germain Ronald N
机构信息
Laboratory of Systems Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
出版信息
Cell. 2015 Jun 18;161(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.052.
Abstract
Many feel that the R01 grant system supporting biomedical research in the U.S. is broken, discouraging entry of young investigators into the system and inadequately supporting more established investigators. Here, I argue for a "person-not-project"-based scheme that would permit creative, unfettered research by new investigators, better tie ongoing research contributions to continued funding, and help match the number of investigators seeking support with available funds.
摘要
许多人认为，美国支持生物医学研究的R01资助体系存在缺陷，阻碍了年轻研究人员进入该体系，并且对资深研究人员的支持也不足。在此，我主张采用一种基于“人而非项目”的方案，该方案将允许新研究人员进行创造性的、不受束缚的研究，使正在进行的研究贡献与持续资助更好地挂钩，并有助于使寻求支持的研究人员数量与可用资金相匹配。
相似文献
1
Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise.修复由美国国立卫生研究院资助的生物医学研究事业。
Cell. 2015 Jun 18;161(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.052.
2
New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".获得美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助的新医生-研究人员：对“濒危物种”的历史视角
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2496-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2496.
3
Demystifying the NIH grant application process.揭开美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）资助申请流程的神秘面纱。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1587-95. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0301-6. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
4
National Institutes of Health Funding to Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery at U.S. Medical Schools.美国国立卫生研究院对美国医学院校骨科手术科室的资助。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 18;99(2):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00088.
5
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.按学术学位和性别划分的皮肤科研究首席研究员 NIH 资助趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):883-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271.
6
Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）R01研究资助经费的减少。
Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):189. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5899.189a.
7
Trends in National Institutes of Health R01 Funding of Principal Investigators in Psychiatry by Gender.美国国立卫生研究院按性别划分的精神病学领域主要研究者R01基金资助趋势。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2024 Sep 19;26(5):24br03725. doi: 10.4088/PCC.24br03725.
8
US-National Institutes of Health-funded research for cutaneous wounds in 2012.2012 年美国国立卫生研究院资助的皮肤伤口研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):789-92. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12099. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
9
Biomedical research funding. NIH uncovers racial disparity in grant awards.生物医学研究资金。美国国立卫生研究院发现拨款奖励中的种族差异。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):925-6. doi: 10.1126/science.333.6045.925.
10
National Institutes of Health-Funded Anesthesiology Research and Anesthesiology Physician-Scientists: Trends, Promises, and Concerns.美国国立卫生研究院资助的麻醉学研究与麻醉学医师科学家：趋势、前景与关注。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1761-1766. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004341.
引用本文的文献
1
Why can't we make research grant allocation systems more consistent? A personal opinion.为什么我们不能让研究经费分配系统更具一致性？个人观点。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 10;9(4):1536-1544. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4855. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Supporting novel biomedical research via multilayer collaboration networks.通过多层合作网络支持新型生物医学研究。
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s41109-016-0015-y. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
3
How to get and keep your lab funded.如何获得并保持实验室资金。
Mol Biol Cell. 2018 Oct 15;29(21):2519-2521. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-07-0416.
4
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.NIH 早期资助研究者的成果：国家过敏和传染病研究所的经验。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0199648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199648. eCollection 2018.
5
Epidemiology at a time for unity.团结时刻的流行病学。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1366-1371. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy179.
6
What's Fair Is Fair: Leveling the Playing Field for Young Scientists.公平就是公平：为青年科学家营造公平竞争的环境。
Vaccines (Basel). 2018 May 31;6(2):33. doi: 10.3390/vaccines6020033.
7
How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?如果政府竞争性研究资金在研究人员中平均分配，每位研究人员将获得多少资金？
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183967. eCollection 2017.
8
The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.过去五十年：测量错误与管理不善阻碍科研进展。
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;116:617-31. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）的同行评审百分制分数对资助产出的预测能力很差。
Elife. 2016 Feb 16;5:e13323. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13323.
本文引用的文献
1
Maximizing the return on taxpayers' investments in fundamental biomedical research.最大化纳税人在基础生物医学研究方面投资的回报。
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 May 1;26(9):1578-82. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1163.
2
Opinion: Addressing systemic problems in the biomedical research enterprise.观点：解决生物医学研究领域的系统性问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 17;112(7):1912-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500969112.
3
A generation at risk: young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce.一代人处于危险之中：年轻的研究人员和生物医学劳动力的未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):313-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418761112. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Funding. NIH institute considers broad shift to 'people' awards.资金。美国国立卫生研究院考虑大幅转向“以人为本”的奖项。
Science. 2014 Jul 25;345(6195):366-7. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6195.366.
5
Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.拯救美国生物医学研究的系统性缺陷。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5773-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404402111. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
Reforming science: methodological and cultural reforms.改革科学：方法学和文化的改革。
Infect Immun. 2012 Mar;80(3):891-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06183-11. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
Zotero 插件