Bendinger Tomasz, Plunkett Nick, Poole Debbie, Turnbull David
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Neuromodulation. 2015 Aug;18(6):465-71; discussion 471. doi: 10.1111/ner.12321. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
The mechanism of action of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is poorly understood and the success of treatment can depend on factors beyond the technical aspects of implantation. The aim of this retrospective analysis is the identification of preimplantation psychological values that may predict outcome of SCS treatment.
The retrospective analysis consisted of data from 83 patients who underwent SCS implantation from 2005 to 2013. Preimplantation evaluation included pain severity, sleep interference and distress each recorded with a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score-HADS), catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale-PCS), and patient's confidence in performing daily activity (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire-PSEQ).
A fall in pain score of greater than 50% at one year follow up was the criteria applied to divide patients into two groups. Group A consisted of 39 patients whose pain score fell more than 50% and group B consisted of 44 patients whose pain score fell less than 50% at one year follow up. The median preimplantation pain score was comparable between the two groups. However, the preimplantation scores for sleep interference, HADS-depression, PCS and PSEQ, were significantly worse in group B. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and univariate regression show that HADS-depression >10 and PSEQ ≤18 are risk factors for failure of SCS treatment, but only sleep interference, assessed with NRS >7 out of 10 was found to be an independent predictor of a less optimal outcome in multiple logistic regression.
Sleep interference appears to be an independent risk factor for unsuccessful SCS therapy.
脊髓刺激(SCS)的作用机制尚不清楚,治疗的成功与否可能取决于植入技术方面以外的因素。本回顾性分析的目的是确定可能预测SCS治疗结果的植入前心理指标。
回顾性分析纳入了2005年至2013年接受SCS植入的83例患者的数据。植入前评估包括疼痛严重程度、睡眠干扰和痛苦程度,每项均采用数字评分量表(NRS 0-10)记录,还有抑郁和焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表-HADS)、灾难化思维(疼痛灾难化量表-PCS)以及患者进行日常活动的信心(疼痛自我效能量表-PSEQ)。
以一年随访时疼痛评分下降超过50%为标准将患者分为两组。A组由39例患者组成,其疼痛评分下降超过50%;B组由44例患者组成,其疼痛评分在一年随访时下降不到50%。两组植入前疼痛评分中位数相当。然而,B组植入前睡眠干扰、HADS-抑郁、PCS和PSEQ评分明显更差。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和单因素回归显示,HADS-抑郁>10分和PSEQ≤18分是SCS治疗失败的危险因素,但在多因素逻辑回归中,只有用NRS评估的睡眠干扰>7分(满分10分)被发现是预后较差的独立预测因素。
睡眠干扰似乎是SCS治疗不成功的独立危险因素。