• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第三部分:结果。

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes.

作者信息

Middleton J W, Piccenna L, Lindsay Gruen R, Williams S, Creasey G, Dunlop S, Brown D, Batchelor P E, Berlowitz D J, Coates S, Dunn J A, Furness J B, Galea M P, Geraghty T, Kwon B K, Urquhart S, Yates D, Bragge P

机构信息

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

National Trauma Research Institute, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):729-37. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.87. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1038/sc.2015.87
PMID:26099211
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Focus Group.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a unified, regional spinal cord injury (SCI) research strategy for Australia and New Zealand.

SETTING

Australia.

METHODS

A 1-day structured stakeholder dialogue was convened in 2013 in Melbourne, Australia, by the National Trauma Research Institute in collaboration with the SCI Network of Australia and New Zealand. Twenty-three experts participated, representing local and international research, clinical, consumer, advocacy, government policy and funding perspectives. Preparatory work synthesised evidence and articulated draft principles and options as a starting point for discussion.

RESULTS

A regional SCI research strategy was proposed, whose objectives can be summarised under four themes. (1) Collaborative networks and strategic partnerships to increase efficiency, reduce duplication, build capacity and optimise research funding. (2) Research priority setting and coordination to manage competing studies. (3) Mechanisms for greater consumer engagement in research. (4) Resources and infrastructure to further develop SCI data registries, evaluate research translation and assess alignment of research strategy with stakeholder interests. These are consistent with contemporary international SCI research strategy development activities.

CONCLUSION

This first step in a regional SCI research strategy has articulated objectives for further development by the wider SCI research community. The initiative has also reinforced the importance of coordinated, collective action in optimising outcomes following SCI.

摘要

研究设计

焦点小组。

目的

为澳大利亚和新西兰制定统一的区域性脊髓损伤(SCI)研究策略。

地点

澳大利亚。

方法

2013年,国家创伤研究所与澳大利亚和新西兰脊髓损伤网络合作,在澳大利亚墨尔本召开了为期一天的结构化利益相关者对话会。23位专家参与其中,代表了本地及国际研究、临床、消费者、宣传、政府政策和资金等方面的观点。筹备工作综合了证据,并阐述了原则草案和备选方案,作为讨论的起点。

结果

提出了一项区域性脊髓损伤研究策略,其目标可归纳为四个主题。(1)建立合作网络和战略伙伴关系,以提高效率、减少重复、建设能力并优化研究资金。(2)确定研究重点并进行协调,以管理相互竞争的研究。(3)让消费者更多地参与研究的机制。(4)进一步发展脊髓损伤数据登记处、评估研究转化以及评估研究策略与利益相关者利益一致性的资源和基础设施。这些与当代国际脊髓损伤研究策略制定活动相一致。

结论

区域性脊髓损伤研究策略的这第一步明确了更广泛的脊髓损伤研究界进一步发展的目标。该倡议还强化了在脊髓损伤后优化结果方面采取协调一致的集体行动的重要性。

相似文献

1
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes.利用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第三部分:结果。
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):729-37. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.87. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第二部分:研究策略的背景
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):721-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.86. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话流程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第一部分:脊髓损伤优先级文献的快速审查
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):714-20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.85. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
4
Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership.脊髓损伤的十大研究重点:英国优先事项设定伙伴关系的方法与结果
Spinal Cord. 2016 May;54(5):341-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.199. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Developing a data sharing community for spinal cord injury research.建立一个用于脊髓损伤研究的数据共享社区。
Exp Neurol. 2017 Sep;295:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
FAIR SCI Ahead: The Evolution of the Open Data Commons for Pre-Clinical Spinal Cord Injury Research.公平科学前进:临床前脊髓损伤研究开放数据共同体的演变。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Mar 15;37(6):831-838. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6674. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
8
A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.在紧迫的时间内完成艰巨的任务:利益相关者对使用电子临床数据进行的比较有效性研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):441-51. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.47.
9
Optimizing spinal cord injury care in Canada: Development of a framework for strategy and action.优化加拿大脊髓损伤护理:制定战略和行动框架。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:921926. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.921926. eCollection 2022.
10
Early exercise after spinal cord injury ('Switch-On'): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.脊髓损伤后的早期运动(“启动”):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jan 7;16:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership.提高脊髓损伤患者生活质量的研究重点:瑞典优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Oct;61(10):570-577. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
Approaches to prioritising research for clinical trial networks: a scoping review.针对临床试验网络的研究优先级排序方法:范围综述。
Trials. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06928-z.
3
How Can Policymakers be Encouraged to Support People With Spinal Cord Injury-Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话流程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第一部分:脊髓损伤优先级文献的快速审查
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):714-20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.85. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第二部分:研究策略的背景
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):721-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.86. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
如何鼓励政策制定者支持脊髓损伤患者——范围审查
Global Spine J. 2022 May;12(4):732-741. doi: 10.1177/21925682211005406. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Ambulances are for emergencies: shifting attitudes through a research-informed behaviour change campaign.救护车是用于应对紧急情况的:通过一项基于研究的行为改变运动来改变态度。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0430-5.
5
Work and SCI: a pilot randomized controlled study of an online resource for job-seekers with spinal cord dysfunction.工作与脊髓损伤:一项针对脊髓功能障碍求职者的在线资源的初步随机对照研究。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Mar;57(3):221-228. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0200-1. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
It is a marathon rather than a sprint: an initial exploration of unmet needs and support preferences of caregivers of children with SCI.这是一场马拉松而非短跑:对脊髓损伤儿童照料者未满足的需求及支持偏好的初步探索。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Mar;56(3):284-294. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0022-6. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to International Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury: Results from a Survey of Clinicians and Researchers.脊髓损伤国际合作的促进因素和障碍:对临床医生和研究人员的调查结果。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Feb 1;35(3):478-485. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5036. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话流程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第一部分:脊髓损伤优先级文献的快速审查
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):714-20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.85. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy.运用结构化的证据审查和利益相关者对话过程制定脊髓损伤研究策略。第二部分:研究策略的背景
Spinal Cord. 2015 Oct;53(10):721-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.86. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
Wrongful termination: lessons from the Geron clinical trial.
不当解雇:来自杰龙公司临床试验的教训。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014 Dec;3(12):1398-401. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0147. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Money and morals: ending clinical trials for financial reasons.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2015;19:297-315. doi: 10.1007/7854_2014_337.
5
Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment: a proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments.脊髓损伤实验的最低信息:脊髓损伤实验报告标准建议
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Aug 1;31(15):1354-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3400. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
6
Minimizing errors in acute traumatic spinal cord injury trials by acknowledging the heterogeneity of spinal cord anatomy and injury severity: an observational Canadian cohort analysis.通过认识脊髓解剖结构和损伤严重程度的异质性来减少急性创伤性脊髓损伤试验中的误差:一项加拿大队列观察性分析
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Sep 15;31(18):1540-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3278. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
7
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critically ill: interpreting the 4Ts test in a randomized trial.危重症患者的肝素诱导的血小板减少症:在一项随机试验中解读4Ts测试
J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):470.e7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
8
Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt.证据摘要与审议对话:对所学内容采取行动的认知与意图。
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jan 1;92(1):20-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.116806. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Demonstrating efficacy in preclinical studies of cellular therapies for spinal cord injury - how much is enough?在脊髓损伤的细胞疗法的临床前研究中证明疗效 - 要达到多少才算足够?
Exp Neurol. 2013 Oct;248:30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Evaluating the first-in-human clinical trial of a human embryonic stem cell-based therapy.评估一项基于人类胚胎干细胞疗法的首次人体临床试验。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2012 Sep;22(3):243-61. doi: 10.1353/ken.2012.0013.