Vande Vusse Lisa K, Caldwell Ellen, Tran Edward, Hogl Laurie, Dinwiddie Steven, López José A, Maier Ronald V, Watkins Timothy R
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
2 Research Institute, Puget Sound Blood Center, Seattle, Washington.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Sep;12(9):1328-35. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-246OC.
Research that applies an unreliable definition for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) may draw false conclusions about its risk factors and biology. The effectiveness of preventive strategies may decrease as a consequence. However, the reliability of the consensus TRALI definition is unknown.
To prospectively study the effect of applying two plausible definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time on TRALI epidemiology.
We studied 316 adults admitted to the intensive care unit and transfused red blood cells within 24 hours of blunt trauma. We identified patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and defined acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time two ways: (1) the time at which the first radiographic or oxygenation criterion was met, and (2) the time both criteria were met. We categorized two corresponding groups of TRALI cases transfused in the 6 hours before acute respiratory distress syndrome onset. We used Cohen's kappa to measure agreement between the TRALI cases and implicated blood components identified by the two acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time definitions. In a nested case-control study, we examined potential risk factors for each group of TRALI cases, including demographics, injury severity, and characteristics of blood components transfused in the 6 hours before acute respiratory distress syndrome onset.
Forty-two of 113 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were TRALI cases per the first acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time definition and 63 per the second definition. There was slight agreement between the two groups of TRALI cases (κ = 0.16; 95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.33) and between the implicated blood components (κ = 0.15, 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.20). Age, Injury Severity Score, high plasma-volume components, and transfused plasma volume were risk factors for TRALI when applying the second acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time definition but not when applying the first definition.
The epidemiology of TRALI varies when applying two plausible definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time to severely injured trauma patients. A TRALI definition that standardizes acute respiratory distress syndrome onset time might improve reliability and align efforts to understand epidemiology, biology, and prevention.
对输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)应用不可靠定义的研究可能会就其危险因素和生物学得出错误结论。因此,预防策略的有效性可能会降低。然而,TRALI共识定义的可靠性尚不清楚。
前瞻性研究应用两种合理的急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间定义对TRALI流行病学的影响。
我们研究了316名入住重症监护病房且在钝性创伤后24小时内输注红细胞的成年人。我们确定了急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者,并通过两种方式定义急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间:(1)首次满足影像学或氧合标准的时间,(2)两项标准均满足的时间。我们将在急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病前6小时内输注的两组相应TRALI病例进行分类。我们使用科恩kappa系数来衡量TRALI病例与两种急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间定义所确定的相关血液成分之间的一致性。在一项巢式病例对照研究中,我们检查了每组TRALI病例的潜在危险因素,包括人口统计学、损伤严重程度以及急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病前6小时内输注的血液成分特征。
按照第一种急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间定义,113例急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中有42例为TRALI病例,按照第二种定义则有63例。两组TRALI病例之间的一致性较低(κ = 0.16;95%置信区间,-0.01至0.33),相关血液成分之间的一致性也较低(κ = 0.15,95%置信区间,0.11 - 0.20)。应用第二种急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间定义时,年龄、损伤严重度评分、高血浆容量成分和输注血浆量是TRALI的危险因素,但应用第一种定义时并非如此。
对严重创伤患者应用两种合理的急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间定义时,TRALI的流行病学情况有所不同。标准化急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病时间的TRALI定义可能会提高可靠性,并使了解流行病学、生物学和预防措施的工作更加协调一致。