Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;40(1):19-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1684049. Epub 2019 May 6.
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) phenotype was first described over 50 years ago and since that time significant progress has been made in understanding the biologic processes underlying the syndrome. Despite this improved understanding, no pharmacologic therapies aimed at the underlying biology have been proven effective in ARDS. Increasingly, ARDS has been recognized as a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by subphenotypes with distinct clinical, radiographic, and biologic differences, distinct outcomes, and potentially distinct responses to therapy. The Berlin Definition of ARDS specifies three severity classifications: mild, moderate, and severe based on the PaO to FiO ratio. Two randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a potential benefit to prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade in moderate to severe phenotypes of ARDS only. Precipitating risk factor, direct versus indirect lung injury, and timing of ARDS onset can determine other clinical phenotypes of ARDS after admission. Radiographic phenotypes of ARDS have been described based on a diffuse versus focal pattern of infiltrates on chest imaging. Finally and most promisingly, biologic subphenotypes or endotypes have increasingly been identified using plasma biomarkers, genetics, and unbiased approaches such as latent class analysis. The potential of precision medicine lies in identifying novel therapeutics aimed at ARDS biology and the subpopulation within ARDS most likely to respond. In this review, we discuss the challenges and approaches to subphenotype ARDS into clinical, radiologic, severity, and biologic phenotypes with an eye toward the future of precision medicine in critical care.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)表型最早于 50 多年前被描述,自那时以来,人们在理解该综合征的生物学过程方面取得了重大进展。尽管有了这种更好的理解,但针对潜在生物学的药物治疗方法在 ARDS 中尚未被证明有效。越来越多的人认识到 ARDS 是一种异质性综合征,其特征是具有不同临床、影像学和生物学差异、不同结局且对治疗的潜在反应不同的亚表型。ARDS 的柏林定义根据 PaO 至 FiO 比值将其严重程度分为轻度、中度和重度三种分类。两项随机对照试验表明,仅在中重度 ARDS 表型中,俯卧位和神经肌肉阻滞剂可能有潜在益处。诱发危险因素、直接与间接性肺损伤以及 ARDS 发病时间可决定入院后 ARDS 的其他临床表型。根据胸部影像学上浸润的弥漫性与局灶性模式,描述了 ARDS 的影像学表型。最后,也是最有希望的是,使用血浆生物标志物、遗传学和无偏方法(如潜在类别分析)越来越多地确定了生物学亚表型或内表型。精准医学的潜力在于确定针对 ARDS 生物学和 ARDS 内最有可能反应的亚人群的新型治疗方法。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了将 ARDS 亚表型纳入临床、影像学、严重程度和生物学表型的挑战和方法,并着眼于重症监护中精准医学的未来。