Institute for Cellular Molecular Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Department of Biological Sciences and RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222.
Microbiol Spectr. 2015 Feb;3(1):MDNA3-0050-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0050-2014.
This review focuses on recent developments in our understanding of group II intron function, the relationships of these introns to retrotransposons and spliceosomes, and how their common features have informed thinking about bacterial group II introns as key elements in eukaryotic evolution. Reverse transcriptase-mediated and host factor-aided intron retrohoming pathways are considered along with retrotransposition mechanisms to novel sites in bacteria, where group II introns are thought to have originated. DNA target recognition and movement by target-primed reverse transcription infer an evolutionary relationship among group II introns, non-LTR retrotransposons, such as LINE elements, and telomerase. Additionally, group II introns are almost certainly the progenitors of spliceosomal introns. Their profound similarities include splicing chemistry extending to RNA catalysis, reaction stereochemistry, and the position of two divalent metals that perform catalysis at the RNA active site. There are also sequence and structural similarities between group II introns and the spliceosome's small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and between a highly conserved core spliceosomal protein Prp8 and a group II intron-like reverse transcriptase. It has been proposed that group II introns entered eukaryotes during bacterial endosymbiosis or bacterial-archaeal fusion, proliferated within the nuclear genome, necessitating evolution of the nuclear envelope, and fragmented giving rise to spliceosomal introns. Thus, these bacterial self-splicing mobile elements have fundamentally impacted the composition of extant eukaryotic genomes, including the human genome, most of which is derived from close relatives of mobile group II introns.
这篇综述重点介绍了我们对 II 类内含子功能的最新认识的发展,这些内含子与反转录转座子和剪接体的关系,以及它们的共同特征如何启发人们思考细菌 II 类内含子作为真核进化关键要素的作用。本文还讨论了逆转录酶介导和宿主因子辅助的内含子反向转座途径,以及反转录转座机制向细菌中新的靶位转移,细菌中的 II 类内含子可能起源于此。通过靶向引发的逆转录进行 DNA 靶标识别和移动,推断出 II 类内含子、非 LTR 反转录转座子(如 LINE 元件)和端粒酶之间的进化关系。此外,II 类内含子几乎可以肯定是剪接体内含子的祖先。它们之间存在着深刻的相似性,包括延伸到 RNA 催化的剪接化学、反应立体化学以及在 RNA 活性位点执行催化作用的两个二价金属的位置。II 类内含子和剪接体的小核 RNA(snRNA)之间以及高度保守的核心剪接体蛋白 Prp8 和 II 类内含子样逆转录酶之间也存在序列和结构上的相似性。有人提出,II 类内含子是在细菌内共生或细菌-古菌融合期间进入真核生物的,在核基因组内大量增殖,从而需要进化出核膜,并发生断裂,产生剪接体内含子。因此,这些细菌自我剪接的移动元件从根本上影响了现存真核生物基因组的组成,包括人类基因组,其中大部分来自移动 II 类内含子的近亲。