Converse Lara, Barrett Kirsten, Rich Eugene, Reschovsky James
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S586-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3365-8.
To support their efforts to promote high quality and efficient care, policymakers need to better understand the key factors associated with variations in physicians' decisions, and in particular, physician deviations from evidence-based care. Clinical vignette survey instruments hold potential for research in this area as an approach that both allows for practical, large-scale study and overcomes the data quality challenges posed by analysis of clinical data. These surveys present respondents with a narrative description of a hypothetical patient case and solicit responses to one or more questions regarding the care of the patient. In this review, we describe various methods for measuring variations in physicians' decisions and highlight a range of design features researchers should consider when developing a clinical vignette survey. We conclude by identifying areas for future research.
为支持他们促进高质量和高效医疗服务的努力,政策制定者需要更好地理解与医生决策差异相关的关键因素,尤其是医生偏离循证医疗的情况。临床病例 vignette 调查工具在该领域的研究中具有潜力,作为一种既能进行实际的大规模研究,又能克服临床数据分析所带来的数据质量挑战的方法。这些调查向受访者呈现一个假设患者病例的叙述性描述,并就患者护理问题征求对一个或多个问题的回答。在本综述中,我们描述了测量医生决策差异的各种方法,并强调了研究人员在开展临床病例 vignette 调查时应考虑的一系列设计特征。我们通过确定未来研究领域来结束本文。