Sakurai Shinichiro, Takashima Hiroaki, Waseda Katsuhisa, Gosho Masahiko, Kurita Akiyoshi, Ando Hirohiko, Maeda Kazuyuki, Suzuki Akihiro, Fujimoto Masanobu, Amano Tetsuya
Department of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, 480-1195, Japan.
Department of Clinical Trial and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;31(7):1295-301. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0699-6. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the fractional flow reserve (FFR) values and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) parameters derived from classic gray-scale IVUS and integrated backscatter (IB)-IVUS, taking into account known confounding factors. Patients with unstable angina pectoris with the frequent development of vulnerable plaques often showed the discrepancy between the FFR value and the quantitative coronary angiography findings. Our target population was 107 consecutive subjects with 114 isolated lesions who were scheduled for elective coronary angiography. The FFR was calculated as the mean distal coronary pressure divided by the mean aortic pressure during maximal hyperemia. Various volumetric parameters such as lipid plaque volume (LPV) and percentage of LPV (%LPV) were measured using IB-IVUS. Simple and multivariate linear regression analysis was employed to evaluate the correlation between FFR values and various classic gray-scale IVUS and IB-IVUS parameters. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare the goodness of fit in an each model. Both the %LPV (r = -0.24; p = 0.01) and LPV (r = -0.40; p < 0.01) were significantly correlated with the FFR value. Only the LPV (AIC = -147.0; p = 0.006) and %LPV (AIC = -152.9; p = 0.005) proved to be independent predictors for the FFR value even after the adjustment of known confounding factors. The volumetric assessment by IB-IVUS could provide better information in terms of the relationship between plaque morphology and the FFR values as compared to the classic IVUS 2-dimensional gray-scale analysis.
本研究的目的是在考虑已知混杂因素的情况下,确定血流储备分数(FFR)值与源自经典灰阶血管内超声(IVUS)和背向散射积分(IB)-IVUS的血管内超声容积参数之间的相关性。不稳定型心绞痛患者常出现易损斑块,其FFR值与定量冠状动脉造影结果之间往往存在差异。我们的目标人群是107例连续的受试者,他们有114个孤立病变,计划进行选择性冠状动脉造影。FFR计算为最大充血时冠状动脉远端平均压力除以主动脉平均压力。使用IB-IVUS测量各种容积参数,如脂质斑块体积(LPV)和LPV百分比(%LPV)。采用简单和多元线性回归分析来评估FFR值与各种经典灰阶IVUS和IB-IVUS参数之间的相关性。赤池信息准则(AIC)用于比较每个模型的拟合优度。%LPV(r = -0.24;p = 0.01)和LPV(r = -0.40;p < 0.01)均与FFR值显著相关。即使在调整已知混杂因素后,只有LPV(AIC = -147.0;p = 0.006)和%LPV(AIC = -152.9;p = 0.005)被证明是FFR值的独立预测因素。与经典IVUS二维灰阶分析相比,IB-IVUS的容积评估在斑块形态与FFR值之间的关系方面可以提供更好的信息。