Perel Sagi, Sadtler Patrick T, Oby Emily R, Ryu Stephen I, Tyler-Kabara Elizabeth C, Batista Aaron P, Chase Steven M
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1500-12. doi: 10.1152/jn.00293.2014. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
A diversity of signals can be recorded with extracellular electrodes. It remains unclear whether different signal types convey similar or different information and whether they capture the same or different underlying neural phenomena. Some researchers focus on spiking activity, while others examine local field potentials, and still others posit that these are fundamentally the same signals. We examined the similarities and differences in the information contained in four signal types recorded simultaneously from multielectrode arrays implanted in primary motor cortex: well-isolated action potentials from putative single units, multiunit threshold crossings, and local field potentials (LFPs) at two distinct frequency bands. We quantified the tuning of these signal types to kinematic parameters of reaching movements. We found 1) threshold crossing activity is not a proxy for single-unit activity; 2) when examined on individual electrodes, threshold crossing activity more closely resembles LFP activity at frequencies between 100 and 300 Hz than it does single-unit activity; 3) when examined across multiple electrodes, threshold crossing activity and LFP integrate neural activity at different spatial scales; and 4) LFP power in the "beta band" (between 10 and 40 Hz) is a reliable indicator of movement onset but does not encode kinematic features on an instant-by-instant basis. These results show that the diverse signals recorded from extracellular electrodes provide somewhat distinct and complementary information. It may be that these signal types arise from biological phenomena that are partially distinct. These results also have practical implications for harnessing richer signals to improve brain-machine interface control.
使用细胞外电极可以记录多种信号。目前尚不清楚不同类型的信号传递的信息是相似还是不同,以及它们捕捉的是相同还是不同的潜在神经现象。一些研究人员专注于锋电位活动,另一些人则研究局部场电位,还有一些人认为这些本质上是相同的信号。我们研究了从植入初级运动皮层的多电极阵列同时记录的四种信号类型所包含信息的异同:来自假定单个神经元的良好分离的动作电位、多神经元阈值穿越以及两个不同频段的局部场电位(LFP)。我们量化了这些信号类型对伸手运动运动学参数的调谐。我们发现:1)阈值穿越活动不是单个神经元活动的替代指标;2)在单个电极上进行检测时,阈值穿越活动在100至300赫兹频率范围内与LFP活动的相似性高于与单个神经元活动的相似性;3)在多个电极上进行检测时,阈值穿越活动和LFP在不同空间尺度上整合神经活动;4)“β频段”(10至40赫兹之间)的LFP功率是运动开始的可靠指标,但不会即时编码运动学特征。这些结果表明,从细胞外电极记录的多种信号提供了 somewhat distinct and complementary information。这些信号类型可能源于部分不同的生物学现象。这些结果对于利用更丰富的信号来改善脑机接口控制也具有实际意义。