• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过“综合世界观框架”理解公众对生物技术的看法。

Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the "Integrative Worldview Framework".

作者信息

De Witt Annick, Osseweijer Patricia, Pierce Robin

机构信息

Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jan;26(1):70-88. doi: 10.1177/0963662515592364. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1177/0963662515592364
PMID:26142147
Abstract

Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals' cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.

摘要

生物技术创新引发了一系列需要理解的社会反应。研究表明,这些反应受到个人文化世界观的影响。我们旨在通过回顾(1)关于公众对生物技术看法的研究,以及(2)使用综合世界观框架(IWF)作为分析视角对生物经济利益相关者辩论的分析,来展示综合世界观框架(IWF)如何用于分析对生物技术的认知。该框架将世界观的概念具体化,并区分了传统、现代和后现代世界观等。应用于这些文献时,该框架阐明了这些世界观如何构成主要社会反应的基础,从而为有关生物技术认知的文献提供了统一的理解。我们得出结论,IWF有助于为社会技术变革认知的研究提供信息,深入了解社会科学中的范式差距,并促进关于这些紧迫问题的反思性和包容性政策制定及辩论。

相似文献

1
Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the "Integrative Worldview Framework".通过“综合世界观框架”理解公众对生物技术的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jan;26(1):70-88. doi: 10.1177/0963662515592364. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
Worldviews and environmental ethics: Contributions of brain processing networks.世界观与环境伦理:大脑处理网络的贡献
Explore (NY). 2023 Sep-Oct;19(5):630-635. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Future societal issues in industrial biotechnology.工业生物技术未来的社会问题。
Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;2(9):1112-20. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700089.
4
Factors influencing Malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology.影响马来西亚公众对农业生物技术态度的因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2011 Sep;20(5):674-89. doi: 10.1177/0963662510369622.
5
Cultural Worldviews and Perceived Risk of Colon Cancer and Diabetes.文化世界观与结肠癌和糖尿病的感知风险
Health Risk Soc. 2020;22(5-6):324-345. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2020.1827142. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Impact of African traditional worldviews on climate change adaptation.非洲传统世界观对气候变化适应的影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Mar;14(2):189-193. doi: 10.1002/ieam.2010.
7
Viewpoint: the importance of worldviews for medical education.观点:世界观对医学教育的重要性。
Acad Med. 2007 Aug;82(8):819-22. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180d098cc.
8
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.对生物技术的态度:评估信息更灵通的公众的意见。
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.
9
The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.宗教领袖、环保人士及科学政策制定者对生物技术的态度。
Recomb DNA Tech Bull. 1985 Dec;8(4):141-64.
10
Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey.土耳其与转基因生物相关风险认知的世界观和话语建构。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Feb;22(2):137-54. doi: 10.1177/0963662511423334. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring disparities in self-reported knowledge about neurotechnology.探索自我报告的神经技术知识方面的差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18488. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00460-1.
2
Taking the temperature of the United States public regarding microbiome engineering.了解美国公众对微生物组工程的看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 11;12:1477377. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477377. eCollection 2024.
3
Public attitudes towards neurotechnology: Findings from two experiments concerning Brain Stimulation Devices (BSDs) and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).
公众对神经技术的态度:两项关于脑刺激设备(BSDs)和脑机接口(BCIs)的实验结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0275454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275454. eCollection 2022.
4
Responsible Learning About Risks Arising from Emerging Biotechnologies.负责任地学习新兴生物技术带来的风险
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Mar 29;27(2):22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00300-1.
5
Enabling new mindsets and transformative skills for negotiating and activating climate action: Lessons from UNFCCC conferences of the parties.为气候行动谈判与推动培养新思维和变革性技能:来自《联合国气候变化框架公约》缔约方会议的经验教训
Environ Sci Policy. 2020 Oct;112:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology.我们应如何监管新育种技术产品?植物生物技术领域受访专家的观点。
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2020 May 5;26:e00460. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00460. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Safe-by-Design: Stakeholders' Perceptions and Expectations of How to Deal with Uncertain Risks of Emerging Biotechnologies in the Netherlands.安全设计:荷兰利益相关者对新兴生物技术不确定风险的看法和期望。
Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1632-1644. doi: 10.1111/risa.13501. Epub 2020 May 18.