Suppr超能文献

文化世界观与结肠癌和糖尿病的感知风险

Cultural Worldviews and Perceived Risk of Colon Cancer and Diabetes.

作者信息

Chen Xuewei, Orom Heather, Kiviniemi Marc T, Waters Erika A, Schofield Elizabeth, Li Yuelin, Hay Jennifer L

机构信息

School of Community Health Sciences, Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.

Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Risk Soc. 2020;22(5-6):324-345. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2020.1827142. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

Abstract

Individuals with different cultural worldviews conceptualize risks in distinct ways, yet this work has not extended to personal illness risk perception. The purpose of this study was to 1) examine the relationships between two types of cultural worldviews (Hierarchy-Egalitarian; Individualism-Communitarianism) and perceived risk (perceived severity and susceptibility) for diabetes and colon cancer, 2) test whether health literacy modifies the above relationships, and 3) investigate whether trust in government health information functions as a putative mediator of the relations between cultural worldviews and disease perceived risk. We recruited (N=600) participants from a nationally-representative Internet survey panel. Results were weighted so the findings are representative of the general United States population. People with a more hierarchical worldview expressed lower perceived susceptibility to developing both diabetes and colon cancer, and perceived these diseases to be less severe, relative to those with a less hierarchical (more egalitarian) worldview. There was no significant association between individualistic worldview and perceived risk. Health literacy modified the relationships between hierarchical worldview and perceived risk; the associations between hierarchical worldview and lower perceived severity were stronger for those with limited health literacy. We did not observe indirect effects of cultural worldviews on perceived risk through trust in health information from government sources. It may be useful to identify specifically tailored risk communication strategies for people with hierarchical and individualistic worldviews, especially those with limited health literacy, that emphasize their important cultural values. Further research examining cultural components of illness risk perceptions may enhance our understanding of risk-protective behaviors.

摘要

具有不同文化世界观的个体对风险的概念化方式各不相同,但这项工作尚未扩展到个人疾病风险认知方面。本研究的目的是:1)考察两种文化世界观(等级制度 - 平等主义;个人主义 - 集体主义)与糖尿病和结肠癌的感知风险(感知严重性和易感性)之间的关系;2)检验健康素养是否会改变上述关系;3)调查对政府健康信息的信任是否作为文化世界观与疾病感知风险之间关系的假定中介。我们从一个具有全国代表性的互联网调查小组中招募了600名参与者。对结果进行了加权处理,以便研究结果能代表美国普通人群。与等级观念较弱(更平等主义)的世界观的人相比,具有更强等级观念世界观的人对患糖尿病和结肠癌的易感性感知较低,并且认为这些疾病的严重性较低。个人主义世界观与感知风险之间没有显著关联。健康素养改变了等级观念世界观与感知风险之间的关系;对于健康素养有限的人来说,等级观念世界观与较低感知严重性之间的关联更强。我们没有观察到文化世界观通过对政府来源健康信息的信任对感知风险产生间接影响。为具有等级观念和个人主义世界观的人,尤其是那些健康素养有限的人,确定专门定制的风险沟通策略可能会很有用,这些策略要强调他们重要的文化价值观。进一步研究疾病风险认知的文化成分可能会增进我们对风险保护行为的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/7986480/3d184d19e215/nihms-1632541-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Worldviews and Perceived Risk of Colon Cancer and Diabetes.文化世界观与结肠癌和糖尿病的感知风险
Health Risk Soc. 2020;22(5-6):324-345. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2020.1827142. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Newest Vital Sign: Frequently Asked Questions.最新生命体征:常见问题解答。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Jul 11;2(3):e125-e127. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180530-02. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use.农村与城市健康信息获取与利用的差异。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jun;35(3):405-417. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12335. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
4
Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information.健康素养与健康信息的使用和信任
J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):724-734. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1511658. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jan;36(1):14-37. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0119.
7
Causes and consequences of uncertainty about illness risk perceptions.疾病风险感知不确定性的原因和后果。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Jul;25(8):1030-1042. doi: 10.1177/1359105317745966. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验