Suppr超能文献

手动疗法随机对照试验中安慰剂的验证

Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Chaibi Aleksander, Šaltytė Benth Jūratė, Bjørn Russell Michael

机构信息

1] Head and Neck Research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Oslo, Norway [2] Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, 1474 Nordbyhagen, Oslo, Norway.

1] Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, 1474 Nordbyhagen, Oslo, Norway [2] HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 6;5:11774. doi: 10.1038/srep11774.

Abstract

At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy migraineurs were randomized to a single-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial that consisted of 12 treatment sessions over 3 months. The participants were randomized to chiropractic SMT or placebo (sham manipulation). After each session, the participants were surveyed on whether they thought they had undergone active treatment ("yes" or "no") and how strongly they believed that active treatment was received (numeric rating scale 0-10). The outcome measures included the rate of successful blinding and the certitude of the participants' beliefs in both treatment groups. At each treatment session, more than 80% of the participants believed that they had undergone active treatment, regardless of group allocation. The odds ratio for believing that active treatment was received was >10 for all treatment sessions in both groups (all p < 0.001). The blinding was maintained throughout the RCT. Our results strongly demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a single-blinded manual-therapy RCT with placebo and to maintain the blinding throughout 12 treatment sessions given over 3 months.

摘要

目前,临床和学术专家对于脊柱推拿疗法(SMT)随机对照试验(RCT)中合适的安慰剂尚无共识。因此,我们研究了是否有可能开展一项使用安慰剂的整脊手法治疗RCT。70名偏头痛患者被随机分配至一项单盲安慰剂对照临床试验,该试验包括在3个月内进行12次治疗。参与者被随机分配接受整脊SMT或安慰剂(假手法)。每次治疗后,对参与者进行调查,询问他们是否认为自己接受了有效治疗(“是”或“否”)以及他们认为接受有效治疗的程度有多强烈(数字评分量表0 - 10)。结局指标包括成功设盲率以及两个治疗组中参与者信念的确信度。在每次治疗时,无论分组如何,超过80%的参与者认为自己接受了有效治疗。两组在所有治疗阶段中,认为接受了有效治疗的优势比均>10(所有p<0.001)。在整个RCT过程中设盲得以维持。我们的结果有力地证明,开展一项使用安慰剂的单盲手法治疗RCT并在3个月内进行的12次治疗中维持设盲是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40cf/4491841/49cfbeee5796/srep11774-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验