Wang Chang-Bi, Chiu Mu-Lin, Lin Po-Chang, Liang Wen-Miin, Chen Chiu-Ying, Chang Yu-Jun, Wu Trong-Neng, Wang Jen-Hsien, Sung Fung-Chang
From the Department of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung (C-BW, M-LC, P-CL, W-ML, C-YC, Y-JC, T-NW, F-CS); Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan (M-LC); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, China Medical University Hospital (P-CL, J-HW); Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, Biostatistics Center, China Medical University, Taichung (W-ML); Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua (Y-JC); Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan (F-CS).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(27):e1070. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001070.
There are limited population-based studies on the progress of oseltamivir therapy for influenza infection.Using insurance claims data of 2005, 2009, and 2010, the authors established an "in-time" cohort and a "lag-time" cohort representing influenza patients taking the medicine within and not within 1 week to examine the treatment progress. Incident outpatient visit, emergency care and hospitalization, and fatality were compared between the 2 cohorts in the first week and the second week of follow-up periods, after the oseltamivir therapy.A total of 112,492 subjects diagnosed with influenza on oseltamivir therapy in 2005, 2009, and 2010 were identified. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the in-time treatment was superior to the lag-time treatment with less repeat outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and fatality. The overall corresponding in-time treatment to lag-time treatment odds ratios (OR) were 0.50, 0.54, and 0.71 (all P value < 0.05), respectively. The in-time to lag-time ORs of all events were 0.50 in 2009 and 0.54 in 2010.Our study demonstrates that the in-time oseltamivir therapy leads to significantly better treatment outcomes. Oseltamivir should be administered as early as the onset of influenza symptoms appears.
关于流感感染的奥司他韦治疗进展,基于人群的研究有限。作者利用2005年、2009年和2010年的保险理赔数据,建立了一个“及时”队列和一个“延迟”队列,分别代表在1周内和不在1周内服用该药物的流感患者,以研究治疗进展。在奥司他韦治疗后的随访期第一周和第二周,比较了两个队列的门诊就诊、急诊和住院情况以及死亡率。共确定了2005年、2009年和2010年接受奥司他韦治疗的112492名被诊断为流感的受试者。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,及时治疗优于延迟治疗,重复门诊就诊、住院和死亡情况更少。及时治疗与延迟治疗的总体相应比值比(OR)分别为0.50、0.54和0.71(所有P值<0.05)。2009年所有事件的及时治疗与延迟治疗OR为0.50,2010年为0.54。我们的研究表明,及时使用奥司他韦治疗可带来明显更好的治疗效果。奥司他韦应在流感症状出现后尽早给药。