Igartua Juan-José, Vega Casanova Jair
a Faculty of Social Sciences , University of Salamanca , Salamanca , Spain.
b Department of Social Communication , Universidad del Norte , Barranquilla , Colombia.
J Health Commun. 2016;21(3):293-300. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1064494. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
The aim of this article is to further knowledge of the explanatory processes of narrative persuasion in the field of health communication, using data obtained in a research study of entertainment-education based on audiovisual fiction. Participating in the study were 208 young persons between the ages of 14 and 20, randomly distributed to three different groups. Each of the groups was exposed to a different episode of the Colombian television series Revelados, desde todas las posiciones. The results showed that greater identification with the main character of the episode transmitting a prevention message was associated with greater cognitive elaboration, which in turn led to more favorable attitudes toward the topics addressed. However, counterarguing was not observed to play a significant mediating role. The findings of this study allow us to conclude that getting people to think and reflect can help persuade them, which suggests that narrative persuasion models and dual models of rhetorical persuasion can be compatible in certain contexts, such as when messages are designed in such a way that characters make explicit arguments that endorse a prosocial message through dialogues.
本文旨在利用基于视听虚构作品的娱乐教育研究中获得的数据,进一步了解健康传播领域中叙事说服的解释过程。参与该研究的是208名年龄在14岁至20岁之间的年轻人,他们被随机分为三个不同的组。每个组都观看了哥伦比亚电视剧《真相大白》(Revelados, desde todas las posiciones)的不同剧集。结果表明,对传递预防信息的剧集中的主角认同感越强,与更高的认知精细化程度相关,而这反过来又导致对所涉及主题的更积极态度。然而,未观察到反驳起到显著的中介作用。本研究的结果使我们能够得出结论,让人们思考和反思有助于说服他们,这表明叙事说服模型和修辞说服的双重模型在某些情况下可能是兼容的,例如当信息以角色通过对话明确支持亲社会信息的方式设计时。