• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后见之明偏差。

Hindsight Bias.

机构信息

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

University of Minnesota.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):411-26. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454303.

DOI:10.1177/1745691612454303
PMID:26168501
Abstract

Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they "knew it all along," that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events' objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one's own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be true and engage in sensemaking to impose meaning on their own knowledge), (b) metacognitive inputs (the ease with which a past outcome is understood may be misattributed to its assumed prior likelihood), and (c) motivational inputs (people have a need to see the world as orderly and predictable and to avoid being blamed for problems). Consequences of hindsight bias include myopic attention to a single causal understanding of the past (to the neglect of other reasonable explanations) as well as general overconfidence in the certainty of one's judgments. New technologies for visualizing and understanding data sets may have the unintended consequence of heightening hindsight bias, but an intervention that encourages people to consider alternative causal explanations for a given outcome can reduce hindsight bias.

摘要

后视偏差是指人们觉得自己“早就知道了”,也就是说,当他们认为一个事件在已知之后比在已知之前更具有可预测性时,就会出现后视偏差。后视偏差包含了三个方面的任意组合:记忆扭曲、对事件客观可能性的信念,或对自己预测能力的主观信念。后视偏差源于(a)认知输入(人们选择性地回忆与他们现在所知道的真实情况一致的信息,并进行意义建构,以使自己的知识具有意义)、(b)元认知输入(对过去结果的理解容易被错误地归因于其假设的先前可能性)和(c)动机输入(人们需要看到世界是有序和可预测的,并避免因问题而受到指责)。后视偏差的后果包括对过去单一因果关系的短视关注(忽视其他合理的解释),以及对自己判断的确定性的普遍过度自信。可视化和理解数据集的新技术可能会产生增强后视偏差的意外后果,但鼓励人们考虑给定结果的替代因果解释的干预措施可以减少后视偏差。

相似文献

1
Hindsight Bias.后见之明偏差。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):411-26. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454303.
2
Metacognitive hindsight bias.元认知后见之明偏差
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):731-744. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01012-w.
3
Hindsight bias: how knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past.事后诸葛亮式偏差:知识和启发式思维如何影响我们对过去的重构。
Memory. 2003 Jul-Sep;11(4-5):357-77. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000595.
4
Human response to traumatic events: an integration of counterfactual thinking, hindsight bias, and attribution theory.人类对创伤性事件的反应:反事实思维、后见之明偏差与归因理论的整合
Psychol Rep. 1993 Apr;72(2):483-94. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.483.
5
Rapid recollection of foresight judgments increases hindsight bias in a memory design.记忆设计中快速回忆前瞻性判断会增加后见之明偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):959-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028579. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
Pragmatic, constructive, and reconstructive memory influences on the hindsight bias.后见之明偏差的实用主义、建设性和重构性记忆影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):331-340. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02158-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation effects and hindsight bias.在对错误信息效应和后见之明偏差的易感性方面的个体差异。
J Gen Psychol. 2014;141(4):393-407. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.954917.
8
Hindsight bias in younger and older adults: the role of access control.年轻人和老年人的后见之明偏差:访问控制的作用。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(2):183-200. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2014.901289. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
[Pain patients show a higher hindsight bias].疼痛患者表现出更高的后见之明偏差。
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(4):561-88.
10
Shared visual attention reduces hindsight bias.共同视觉注意减少后见之明偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Dec;23(12):1524-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797612447817. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
People calibrate future expectations to past performance when predicting transparently random events.当预测明显随机的事件时,人们会根据过去的表现来校准对未来的期望。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf237. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf237. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Random behavior is stable across tasks and time.随机行为在不同任务和时间跨度内保持稳定。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jun;154(6):1571-1582. doi: 10.1037/xge0001755. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations.当常见的认知偏差影响汇报谈话时。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Dec 18;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00324-0.
4
Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.乳腺癌幸存者基于行为的体重管理群组式远程医疗项目参与的认知、促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 20;32(12):808. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08999-x.
5
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
6
Information mismatch in PHH3-assisted mitosis annotation leads to interpretation shifts in H&E slide analysis.PHH3 辅助有丝分裂标注中的信息不匹配导致 H&E 切片分析的解读发生转变。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77244-6.
7
The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom.团队心理安全感在课堂团队合作中的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37618. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
8
Response to: Histological type, invasive mediastinal staging, and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.对《肺癌患者的组织学类型、纵隔侵犯分期及预后》的回应
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 15;72:102644. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102644. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?去偏研究如何助力减少歧视的努力?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 Feb;29(1):81-105. doi: 10.1177/10888683241244829. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Can knowledgeable experts assess costs and outcomes as if they were ignorant? An experiment within precision medicine evaluation.有识之士能否像无知者那样评估成本和结果?精准医学评估中的一项实验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;40(1):e4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002714.