Alvard Michael S
Department of Anthropology, Texas A & M University, Mail: 4352, 77843-4352, College Station, TX.
Hum Nat. 2003 Jun;14(2):129-63. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1001-5.
Work was conducted among traditional, subsistence whale hunters in Lamalera, Indonesia, in order to test if strict biological kinship or lineage membership is more important for explaining the organization of cooperative hunting parties ranging in size from 8 to 14 men. Crew identifications were collected for all 853 hunts that occurred between May 3 and August 5, 1999. Lineage identity and genetic relatedness were determined for a sample of 189 hunters. Results of matrix regression show that genetic kinship explains little of the hunters' affiliations independent of lineage identity. Crew members are much more closely related to each other than expected by chance, but this is due to the correlation between lineage membership and genetic kinship. Lineage members are much more likely to affiliate in crews, but kin with r<0.5 are just as likely not to affiliate. The results are discussed vis-à-vis the evolution of cooperation and group identity.
研究在印度尼西亚拉马勒拉的传统自给性捕鲸者中展开,目的是检验严格的生物亲属关系或世系成员身份,对于解释由8至14名男性组成的合作狩猎团队的组织形式而言,哪一个更为重要。收集了1999年5月3日至8月5日期间所有853次狩猎活动的船员身份信息。对189名猎人的样本确定了世系身份和基因关联性。矩阵回归结果表明,独立于世系身份之外,基因亲属关系对猎人之间的从属关系解释甚少。船员彼此之间的关系比随机预期的更为紧密,但这是由于世系成员身份与基因亲属关系之间的相关性所致。世系成员更有可能在船员团队中从属在一起,但基因关联性小于0.5的亲属同样有可能不从属在一起。针对合作与群体身份的演变对研究结果进行了讨论。