• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲属结构和世系制度的出现:多层次进化模拟与实证数据分析。

Emergence of kinship structures and descent systems: multi-level evolutionary simulation and empirical data analysis.

机构信息

Department of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan.

Research Center for Complex Systems Biology, University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 23;289(1969):20212641. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2641.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2021.2641
PMID:35193405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864366/
Abstract

In many indigenous societies, people are categorized into several cultural groups, or clans, within which they believe they share ancestors. Clan attributions provide certain rules for marriage and descent. Such rules between clans constitute kinship structures. Anthropologists have revealed several kinship structures. Here, we propose an agent-based model of indigenous societies to reveal the evolution of kinship structures. In the model, several societies compete. Societies themselves comprise multiple families with parameters for cultural traits and mate preferences. These values determine with whom each family cooperates and competes, and they are transmitted to a new generation with mutation. The growth rate of each family is determined by the number of cooperators and competitors. Through this multi-level evolution, family traits and preferences diverge to form clusters that can be regarded as clans. Subsequently, kinship structures emerge, including dual organization and generalized or restricted exchange, as well as patrilineal, matrilineal and double descent systems. These structures emerge depending on the necessity of cooperation and the strength of mating competition. Their dependence is also estimated analytically. Finally, statistical analysis using the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, a global ethnographic database, empirically verified the theoretical results. Such collaboration between theoretical and empirical approaches will unveil universal features in anthropology.

摘要

在许多土著社会中,人们被划分为几个文化群体,即氏族,他们相信自己共享祖先。氏族归属为婚姻和血统提供了一定的规则。氏族之间的这种规则构成了亲属结构。人类学家已经揭示了几种亲属结构。在这里,我们提出了一个基于主体的土著社会模型,以揭示亲属结构的演变。在该模型中,几个社会相互竞争。社会本身由多个具有文化特征和配偶偏好参数的家庭组成。这些值决定了每个家庭与谁合作和竞争,并通过突变传递给下一代。每个家庭的增长率取决于合作者和竞争者的数量。通过这种多层次的进化,家庭特征和偏好会产生分歧,形成可以被视为氏族的聚类。随后,亲属结构出现,包括双重组织和广义或限制交换,以及父系、母系和双重血统系统。这些结构的出现取决于合作的必要性和交配竞争的强度。它们的依赖性也可以进行分析估计。最后,使用全球民族志数据库——标准跨文化样本进行的统计分析,从经验上验证了理论结果。这种理论和经验方法之间的合作将揭示人类学中的普遍特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/1b2d9b0d4d2f/rspb20212641f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/f6f224c7ba30/rspb20212641f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/2d6dbd185ab5/rspb20212641f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/70f43a46e2ac/rspb20212641f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/1b2d9b0d4d2f/rspb20212641f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/f6f224c7ba30/rspb20212641f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/2d6dbd185ab5/rspb20212641f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/70f43a46e2ac/rspb20212641f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5bc/8864366/1b2d9b0d4d2f/rspb20212641f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergence of kinship structures and descent systems: multi-level evolutionary simulation and empirical data analysis.亲属结构和世系制度的出现:多层次进化模拟与实证数据分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 23;289(1969):20212641. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2641.
2
Formation of human kinship structures depending on population size and cultural mutation rate.人类亲属关系结构的形成取决于人口规模和文化突变率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2405653121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405653121. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Evolution of kinship structures driven by marriage tie and competition.婚姻纽带和竞争驱动的亲属结构演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2378-2384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917716117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
What is a population? Spouse import in the northwest Amazon.什么是种群?亚马孙西北部的配偶迁入。
South Am Indian Stud. 1994 Mar(4):10-7.
5
Social Practice and Shared History, Not Social Scale, Structure Cross-Cultural Complexity in Kinship Systems.社会实践和共同历史,而不是社会规模和结构,塑造了亲属制度的跨文化复杂性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;12(2):744-765. doi: 10.1111/tops.12430. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
No universals in the cultural evolution of kinship terminology.亲属称谓的文化演变中不存在普遍性。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Aug 3;2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.41.
7
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges Main Sequence Theory of human social evolution.班图亲属关系的系统发育重建对人类社会进化的主序列理论提出了挑战。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17414-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415744111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems.从全球视角看母系继嗣:利用跨文化分析揭示人类亲属制度。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180077. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0077. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
9
Intergenerational and sibling conflict under patrilocality. A model of reproductive skew applied to human kinship.从夫居情况下的代际冲突和兄弟姐妹冲突。适用于人类亲属关系的生殖偏斜模型。
Hum Nat. 2014 Mar;25(1):66-79. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9188-6.
10
Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective.跨物种视角下的直系亲属组织。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20190005. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0005. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-organized institutions in evolutionary dynamical-systems games.进化动力系统博弈中的自组织机构
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 15;122(15):e2500960122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500960122. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Formation of human kinship structures depending on population size and cultural mutation rate.人类亲属关系结构的形成取决于人口规模和文化突变率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2405653121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405653121. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Grouping promotes both partnership and rivalry with long memory in direct reciprocity.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of kinship structures driven by marriage tie and competition.婚姻纽带和竞争驱动的亲属结构演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2378-2384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917716117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Social Practice and Shared History, Not Social Scale, Structure Cross-Cultural Complexity in Kinship Systems.社会实践和共同历史,而不是社会规模和结构,塑造了亲属制度的跨文化复杂性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;12(2):744-765. doi: 10.1111/tops.12430. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
The origin of a primordial genome through spontaneous symmetry breaking.
分组促进了直接互惠中的伙伴关系和竞争,同时具有长记忆。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 20;19(6):e1011228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011228. eCollection 2023 Jun.
通过自发对称破缺产生原始基因组。
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 15;8(1):250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00243-x.
4
D-PLACE: A Global Database of Cultural, Linguistic and Environmental Diversity.D-PLACE:一个关于文化、语言和环境多样性的全球数据库。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158391. eCollection 2016.
5
Kinship, lineage, and an evolutionary perspective on cooperative hunting groups in Indonesia.亲属关系、世系以及对印度尼西亚合作狩猎群体的进化视角
Hum Nat. 2003 Jun;14(2):129-63. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1001-5.
6
Genetic and cultural kinship among the Lamaleran whale hunters.拉玛勒兰捕鲸者的遗传和文化亲缘关系。
Hum Nat. 2011 Jul;22(1-2):89-107. doi: 10.1007/s12110-011-9104-x.
7
The rebirth of kinship: evolutionary and quantitative approaches in the revitalization of a dying field.亲属关系的重生:一个垂死领域复兴的进化和定量方法。
Hum Nat. 2011 Jul;22(1-2):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12110-011-9105-9.
8
Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure.狩猎采集社会中的共居模式展示了独特的人类社会结构。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1286-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1199071.
9
Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population.一个部落群体中的生活史、血亲复仇与战争
Science. 1988 Feb 26;239(4843):985-92. doi: 10.1126/science.239.4843.985.
10
Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection.通过多层次选择实现合作的进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10952-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602530103. Epub 2006 Jul 7.