Williams Jessica R, Gavin Loretta E, Carter Marion W, Glass Evelyn
University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies, Coral Gables, Florida; MANILA Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Division of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Office of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S93-S106. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.017.
A central premise of the literature on healthcare quality is that improving the quality of care will lead to improvements in health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to better inform quality improvement efforts in the area of family planning. The objective of this systematic review is to update a previous review focused on the quality of family planning services, namely, the impact of quality improvement efforts and client perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. In addition, this review includes new literature examining provider perspectives.
Multiple databases from January 1985 through January 2015 were searched within the peer-reviewed literature that described the quality of family planning services. The retrieval and inclusion criteria included full-length articles published in English, which described studies occurring in a clinic-based setting to include family planning services.
Search strategies identified 16,145 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. No new intervention studies addressing the impact of quality improvement efforts on family planning outcomes were identified. Sixteen articles provided information relevant to client or provider perspectives about what constitutes quality family planning services. Clients and providers mostly identified the need for services that were accessible, client-centered, and equitable. Themes related to effectiveness, efficiency, and safety were mentioned less frequently.
Family planning services that account for both patient and provider perspectives may be more effective. Further research is needed to examine the impact of improved quality on provider practices, client behavior, and health outcomes.
医疗保健质量文献的一个核心前提是,提高护理质量将带来健康结果的改善。为了更好地为计划生育领域的质量改进工作提供信息,开展了一项系统评价。本系统评价的目的是更新之前一项侧重于计划生育服务质量的评价,即质量改进工作的影响以及客户对优质计划生育服务构成要素的看法。此外,本次评价还纳入了考察提供者观点的新文献。
在1985年1月至2015年1月期间的多个数据库中检索了同行评审文献中描述计划生育服务质量的内容。检索和纳入标准包括以英文发表的完整文章,这些文章描述了在基于诊所的环境中开展的包括计划生育服务在内的研究。
检索策略共识别出16145篇文章,其中16篇符合纳入标准。未发现新的关于质量改进工作对计划生育结果影响的干预性研究。16篇文章提供了与客户或提供者对优质计划生育服务构成要素的观点相关的信息。客户和提供者大多认为需要提供可及、以客户为中心且公平的服务。与有效性、效率和安全性相关的主题提及较少。
兼顾患者和提供者观点的计划生育服务可能更有效。需要进一步研究来考察质量改善对提供者行为、客户行为和健康结果的影响。