系统评价证据方法：提供优质计划生育服务。
Systematic Review Evidence Methodology: Providing Quality Family Planning Services.
作者信息
Tregear Stephen J, Gavin Loretta E, Williams Jessica R
机构信息
Manila Consulting Group, Inc., Falls Church, Virginia.
Office of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
出版信息
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.033.
Abstract
From 2010 to 2014, CDC and the Office of Population Affairs at the USDHHS collaborated on the development of clinical recommendations for providing quality family planning services. A high priority was placed on the use of existing scientific evidence in developing the recommendations, in accordance with IOM guidelines for how to develop "trustworthy" clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, a series of systematic reviews were developed using a transparent and reproducible methodology aimed at ensuring that the clinical practice guidelines would be based on evidence collected in the most unbiased manner possible. This article describes the methodology used in conducting these systematic reviews, which occurred from mid-2011 through 2012.
摘要
2010年至2014年期间，美国疾病控制与预防中心（CDC）与美国卫生与公众服务部（USDHHS）人口事务办公室合作，共同制定提供优质计划生育服务的临床建议。根据医学研究所在如何制定“可靠”临床实践指南方面的指导方针，在制定这些建议时高度重视利用现有科学证据。因此，采用了一种透明且可重复的方法开展了一系列系统评价，旨在确保临床实践指南尽可能基于以最公正方式收集的证据。本文介绍了在2011年年中至2012年期间进行这些系统评价所使用的方法。
相似文献
1
Systematic Review Evidence Methodology: Providing Quality Family Planning Services.系统评价证据方法：提供优质计划生育服务。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.033.
2
Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.临床指南和支付方政策对慢性下腰痛融合治疗的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
5
Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.基于循证方法治疗慢性下腰痛的系统评价方法学。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S10-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef8ee.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施：系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果：来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验：定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
引用本文的文献
1
Quality matters: the role of service quality in discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Sub-Saharan Africa; systematic review and meta-analysis.质量至关重要：撒哈拉以南非洲地区长效可逆避孕方法停用中服务质量的作用；系统评价与荟萃分析
Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 14;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02091-1.
2
Comanagement with rheumatology and prescription biologics filled during pregnancy in women with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective analysis of US administrative claims data.妊娠合并风湿病患者的风湿病学联合管理和处方生物制剂的使用：美国行政索赔数据的回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e065189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065189.
3
Community Education and Engagement in Family Planning: Updated Systematic Review.计划生育中的社区教育与参与：更新的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):747-758. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.022.
4
Clinic-Based Programs to Prevent Repeat Teen Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.基于诊所的项目预防青少年重复怀孕：系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.001.
5
Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review Update.为年轻人提供的青少年友好型计划生育服务：系统评价更新。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):725-735. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.010.
6
Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.计划生育提醒系统：更新的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):716-724. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.009.
7
Impact of Contraceptive Education on Knowledge and Decision Making: An Updated Systematic Review.避孕教育对知识和决策的影响：最新系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.012.
8
Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.患者对避孕咨询的偏好：系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006.
9
Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: An Updated Systematic Review.临床环境中的避孕咨询：更新的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):677-690. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.006.
10
Receipt of Selected Preventive Health Services for Women and Men of Reproductive Age - United States, 2011-2013.2011 - 2013年美国育龄男女接受特定预防性健康服务情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Oct 27;66(20):1-31. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6620a1.
本文引用的文献
1
Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.医患双方对医疗质量的看法：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S93-S106. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.017.
2
Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review.青少年计划生育服务中的保密性：一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.001.
3
Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review.面向年轻人的青年友好型计划生育服务：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.019.
4
Programs to Strengthen Parent-Adolescent Communication About Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review.加强父母与青少年关于生殖健康沟通的项目：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.022.
5
Impact of Reminder Systems in Clinical Settings to Improve Family Planning Outcomes: A Systematic Review.临床环境中提醒系统对改善计划生育结果的影响：一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.018.
6
Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review.避孕教育对避孕知识及决策的影响：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S46-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.031.
7
Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review.临床环境中避孕咨询的影响：一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.023.
8
Community Engagement in Family Planning in the U.S.: A Systematic Review.美国社区参与计划生育：一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.029.
9
Community Education for Family Planning in the U.S.: A Systematic Review.美国计划生育社区教育：一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.030.
10
Introduction to the Supplement: Development of Federal Recommendations for Family Planning Services.增刊引言：联邦计划生育服务建议的制定
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.028.
Zotero 插件