Commentary: On Effect Measures, Heterogeneity, and the Laws of Nature.
作者信息
Panagiotou Orestis A, Trikalinos Thomas A
机构信息
From the aDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and bCenter for Evidence-based Medicine, and Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.
出版信息
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):710-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000359.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: On Effect Measures, Heterogeneity, and the Laws of Nature.
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):710-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000359.
2
Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1158-60. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn204.
3
Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):714-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000354.
4
Meta-analysis without study-specific variance information: Heterogeneity case.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):196-210. doi: 10.1177/0962280217718867. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Commentary on 'Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise'.
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 10;30(20):2507-8; discussion 2509-10. doi: 10.1002/sim.4278. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
6
Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):290-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117248.
7
Confidence intervals for heterogeneity measures in meta-analysis.
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Sep 15;178(6):993-1004. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt060. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
A guide to understanding meta-analysis.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;41(7):496-504. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3333. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):932; author reply 933. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp157. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
10
Heterogeneous views on heterogeneity.
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1740-2. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn235. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
引用本文的文献
1
An evolved interpretation of Austin Bradford Hill's causal viewpoints and their influence on epidemiologic methods.
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae367.
2
Efficacy of bupropion and varenicline genetic markers in choosing pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation, and implications for combining drugs: A randomized controlled trial - GENTSMOKING.
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Apr 16;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/186072. eCollection 2024.
3
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy Based on Genetically-Informed Biomarkers: What is the Evidence?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1289-1293. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz009.
4
The choice of effect measure for binary outcomes: Introducing counterfactual outcome state transition parameters.
Epidemiol Methods. 2018 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1515/em-2016-0014. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):714-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000354.
2
GOSH - a graphical display of study heterogeneity.
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Sep;3(3):214-23. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1053. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice.
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jan;1(1):66-80. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.6. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
4
A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data.
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 28;32(5):808-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.5553. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
Goodness-of-fit methods for generalized linear mixed models.
Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):1000-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00365.x.
6
Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1575-600. doi: 10.1002/sim.1188.
7
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1046-55. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8.
8
Choice of effect measure for epidemiological data.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;53(9):931-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00210-9.
9
Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.
Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::aid-sim491>3.0.co;2-p.
10
An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Stat Med. 1998 Sep 15;17(17):1923-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980915)17:17<1923::aid-sim874>3.0.co;2-6.
Zotero 插件