• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用单分子计数技术检测粪便中的艰难梭菌毒素:与细胞培养细胞毒性中和试验检测游离毒素的比较。

Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins in Stool by Use of Single-Molecule Counting Technology: Comparison with Detection of Free Toxin by Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-19. Print 2019 Nov.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.00719-19
PMID:31434724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6812992/
Abstract

Laboratory tests for infection (CDI) rely on the detection of free toxin or molecular detection of toxin genes. The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay is a rapid, automated, and ultrasensitive assay that detects toxins A and B in stool. We compared CDI assays across two prospective multicenter studies to set a cutoff for the Clarity assay and to independently validate the performance compared with that of a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCCNA). The cutoff was set by two sites testing fresh samples from 897 subjects with suspected CDI and then validated at four sites testing fresh samples from 1,005 subjects with suspected CDI. CCCNA testing was performed at a centralized laboratory. Samples with discrepant results between the Clarity assay and CCCNA were retested with CCCNA when the Clarity result agreed with that of at least one comparator method; toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIA), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) detection, and PCR were performed on all samples. The cutoff for the Clarity assay was set at 12.0 pg/ml. Compared to results with CCCNA, the Clarity assay initially had 85.2% positive agreement and 92.4% negative agreement. However, when samples with discrepant results between the Clarity assay and CCCNA in the validation study were retested by CCCNA, 13/17 (76.5%) Clarity-negative but CCCNA-positive samples (Clarity/CCCNA) became CCCNA, and 5/26 (19.2%) Clarity/CCCNA samples became CCCNA, resulting in a 96.3% positive agreement and 93.0% negative agreement between Clarity and CCCNA results. The toxin EIA had 59.8% positive agreement with CCCNA. The Clarity assay was the most sensitive free-toxin immunoassay, capable of providing CDI diagnosis in a single-step solution. A different CCCNA result was reported for 42% of retested samples, increasing the positive agreement between Clarity and CCCNA from 85.2% to 96.3% and indicating the challenges of comparing free-toxin results to CCCNA results as a reference standard.

摘要

实验室检测感染(CDI)依赖于游离毒素的检测或毒素基因的分子检测。Singulex Clarity C. diff 毒素 A/B 检测是一种快速、自动化和超灵敏的检测方法,可检测粪便中的毒素 A 和 B。我们在两项前瞻性多中心研究中比较了 CDI 检测方法,为 Clarity 检测方法设定了一个截止值,并与细胞培养细胞毒性中和检测 (CCCNA) 进行了独立验证。该截止值由两个地点通过测试 897 名疑似 CDI 患者的新鲜样本确定,然后在四个地点通过测试 1005 名疑似 CDI 患者的新鲜样本进行验证。CCCNA 测试在一个集中的实验室进行。Clarity 检测方法与 CCCNA 检测结果不一致的样本,如果 Clarity 检测结果与至少一种比较方法一致,则用 CCCNA 重新检测;对所有样本进行毒素酶免疫检测(EIA)、谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)检测和 PCR。Clarity 检测方法的截止值设定为 12.0pg/ml。与 CCCNA 检测结果相比,Clarity 检测方法最初具有 85.2%的阳性符合率和 92.4%的阴性符合率。然而,当验证研究中 Clarity 检测方法与 CCCNA 检测结果不一致的样本用 CCCNA 重新检测时,17 个 Clarity 阴性但 CCCNA 阳性样本(Clarity/CCCNA)中有 13 个(76.5%)成为 CCCNA,26 个 Clarity/CCCNA 样本中有 5 个(19.2%)成为 CCCNA,导致 Clarity 和 CCCNA 结果之间的阳性符合率为 96.3%,阴性符合率为 93.0%。毒素 EIA 与 CCCNA 的阳性符合率为 59.8%。Clarity 检测方法是最敏感的游离毒素免疫检测方法,能够在一步解决方案中提供 CDI 诊断。42%的重新检测样本报告了不同的 CCCNA 结果,使 Clarity 与 CCCNA 的阳性符合率从 85.2%提高到 96.3%,表明比较游离毒素结果与 CCCNA 结果作为参考标准时存在挑战。

相似文献

1
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins in Stool by Use of Single-Molecule Counting Technology: Comparison with Detection of Free Toxin by Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay.利用单分子计数技术检测粪便中的艰难梭菌毒素:与细胞培养细胞毒性中和试验检测游离毒素的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-19. Print 2019 Nov.
2
High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.高敏艰难梭菌毒素检测与应用谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素酶联免疫吸附试验及细胞毒素检测的艰难梭菌实验室算法的高度一致性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01629-19.
3
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.利用自动化单分子计数技术检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的超敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00908-18. Print 2018 Nov.
4
Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素可提高临床特异性:与核酸扩增检测相比,减少过度诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00945-19. Print 2019 Nov.
5
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates.产毒艰难梭菌的检测:两种市售酶免疫测定法及聚合酶链反应法对粪便样本和粪便分离株的应用价值
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Sensitivity of Single-Molecule Array Assays for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Comparison to Conventional Laboratory Testing Algorithms.单细胞阵列分析检测艰难梭菌毒素的敏感性与传统实验室检测算法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00452-18. Print 2018 Aug.
8
Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.诊断试验结果不一致的艰难梭菌感染患者的循环阈值、毒素浓度及临床特征评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01681-19.
9
Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool.用于超灵敏检测和定量粪便中艰难梭菌毒素的数字酶联免疫吸附测定法的开发与验证
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct;53(10):3204-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01334-15. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.两步谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原实时聚合酶链反应检测产毒艰难梭菌。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Testing for Higher Diagnostic Accuracy.用于提高诊断准确性的超敏艰难梭菌毒素检测
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01913-19.
2
Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.诊断试验结果不一致的艰难梭菌感染患者的循环阈值、毒素浓度及临床特征评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01681-19.
3
High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.高敏艰难梭菌毒素检测与应用谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素酶联免疫吸附试验及细胞毒素检测的艰难梭菌实验室算法的高度一致性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01629-19.
4
Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素可提高临床特异性:与核酸扩增检测相比,减少过度诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00945-19. Print 2019 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素揭示毒素基因循环阈值对毒素预测的准确性欠佳。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01885-18. Print 2019 Jun.
3
Clinical Impact of Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold-Predicted Toxin Reporting in Pediatric Patients.艰难梭菌 PCR 循环阈值预测毒素报告对儿科患者的临床影响。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Feb 28;9(1):44-50. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy117.
4
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.利用自动化单分子计数技术检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的超敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00908-18. Print 2018 Nov.
5
Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay.采用超敏定量免疫法比较有症状感染和无症状携带的成人艰难梭菌粪便毒素浓度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy415.
6
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
7
Immunological Stability of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Clinical Specimens.艰难梭菌毒素在临床标本中的免疫稳定性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):434-438. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.20. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
8
Potential of real-time PCR threshold cycle (CT) to predict presence of free toxin and clinically relevant C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients with cancer: A reply.实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)阈值循环数(CT)预测癌症患者中游离毒素的存在及临床相关艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的潜力:一则回复
J Infect. 2018 Apr;76(4):424-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Quantitation as Predictor of Toxin Presence in Clostridium difficile Infection.核酸扩增试验定量检测对艰难梭菌感染中毒素存在的预测价值。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01316-17. Print 2018 Mar.
10
Potential of real-time PCR threshold cycle (C) to predict presence of free toxin and clinically relevant C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients with cancer.实时 PCR 阈值循环 (C) 在预测癌症患者中游离毒素和临床相关艰难梭菌感染 (CDI) 存在的可能性。
J Infect. 2018 Apr;76(4):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 8.