Redlinger-Grosse Krista, Veach Patricia McCarthy, Cohen Stephanie, LeRoy Bonnie S, MacFarlane Ian M, Zierhut Heather
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 250 Education Sciences Building, 56 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):239-57. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
The need for evidence-based medicine, including comparative effectiveness studies and patient-centered outcomes research, has become a major healthcare focus. To date, a comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes, as espoused by genetic counselors, has not been established and thus, identification of outcomes unique to genetic counseling services has become a priority for the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). The purpose of this study was to take a critical first step at identifying a more comprehensive list of genetic counseling outcomes. This paper describes the results of a focus group study using the Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) as a framework to characterize patient-centered outcomes of genetic counseling clinical practice. Five focus groups were conducted with 27 peer nominated participants who were clinical genetic counselors, genetic counseling program directors, and/or outcomes researchers in genetic counseling. Members of each focus group were asked to identify genetic counseling outcomes for four to five of the 17 goals of the REM. A theory-driven, thematic analysis of focus group data yielded 194 genetic counseling outcomes across the 17 goals. Participants noted some concerns about how genetic counseling outcomes will be measured and evaluated given varying stakeholders and the long-term nature of genetic concerns. The present results provide a list of outcomes for use in future genetic counseling outcomes research and for empirically-supported clinical interventions.
对循证医学的需求,包括比较疗效研究和以患者为中心的结局研究,已成为医疗保健的一个主要重点。迄今为止,遗传咨询师所支持的遗传咨询结局的完整清单尚未确立,因此,确定遗传咨询服务特有的结局已成为美国遗传咨询师协会(NSGC)的一项优先任务。本研究的目的是朝着确定更完整的遗传咨询结局清单迈出关键的第一步。本文描述了一项焦点小组研究的结果,该研究以互动参与模型(REM)为框架,以描述遗传咨询临床实践中以患者为中心的结局。对27名由同行提名的参与者进行了五次焦点小组讨论,这些参与者是临床遗传咨询师、遗传咨询项目主任和/或遗传咨询领域的结局研究人员。要求每个焦点小组的成员为REM的17个目标中的四到五个确定遗传咨询结局。对焦点小组数据进行的理论驱动的主题分析在这17个目标中产生了194个遗传咨询结局。鉴于利益相关者各不相同以及遗传问题的长期性,参与者对如何衡量和评估遗传咨询结局表示了一些担忧。目前的结果提供了一份结局清单,供未来的遗传咨询结局研究以及基于实证的临床干预使用。