Philip Noah S, Carpenter S Louisa, Ridout Samuel J, Sanchez George, Albright Sarah E, Tyrka Audrey R, Price Lawrence H, Carpenter Linda L
Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States; Butler Hospital Mood Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States.
Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 1;186:13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.024. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to left prefrontal cortex at 10Hz is the most commonly utilized protocol for major depressive disorder (MDD). Published data suggests that left sided 5Hz rTMS may be efficacious and well tolerated.
We analyzed outcomes in a naturalistic cohort of MDD patients who could not tolerate 10Hz rTMS and were routinely switched to 5Hz. We hypothesized that the efficacy of 5Hz rTMS would be equivalent to 10Hz.
Records were reviewed for patients (n=98) who received 15 or more acute rTMS treatments. The sample was split based upon the frequency (10 or 5Hz) at which the majority of treatments were delivered. The Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS-SR) and 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were used to evaluate outcomes.
Baseline IDS-SR was higher in the 5Hz (n=27) than in the 10Hz (n=71) group (p<.05), as was frequency of comorbid anxiety (p=.002). Depression outcomes did not differ between groups, and there were no differences in response or remission rates (all p>.1). Statistical power was sufficient to detect small group differences (d=.26).
Open-label data in a naturalistic setting.
Outcomes associated with 5Hz rTMS did not differ from 10Hz, despite higher baseline depressive symptom severity and anxiety in 5Hz patients. 5Hz stimulation may be an alternative treatment option for patients unable to tolerate 10Hz rTMS.
10赫兹重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于左侧前额叶皮质是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)最常用的方案。已发表的数据表明,左侧5赫兹rTMS可能有效且耐受性良好。
我们分析了一组无法耐受10赫兹rTMS且常规改用5赫兹rTMS的MDD患者的自然队列研究结果。我们假设5赫兹rTMS的疗效等同于10赫兹rTMS。
回顾了接受15次或更多次急性rTMS治疗的患者(n = 98)的记录。样本根据大多数治疗所采用的频率(10或5赫兹)进行划分。使用抑郁症状量表(IDS-SR)和9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评估结果。
5赫兹组(n = 27)的基线IDS-SR高于10赫兹组(n = 71)(p <.05),共病焦虑的频率也是如此(p =.002)。两组之间的抑郁结果没有差异,反应率或缓解率也没有差异(所有p >.1)。统计效力足以检测出小组间的差异(d =.26)。
自然环境下的开放标签数据。
尽管5赫兹组患者的基线抑郁症状严重程度和焦虑程度较高,但与5赫兹rTMS相关的结果与10赫兹rTMS并无差异。对于无法耐受10赫兹rTMS的患者,5赫兹刺激可能是一种替代治疗选择。