Kopylov Uri, Yablecovitch Doron, Lahat Adi, Neuman Sandra, Levhar Nina, Greener Tomer, Klang Eyal, Rozendorn Noa, Amitai Marianne M, Ben-Horin Shomron, Eliakim Rami
Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1316-23. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.221. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are associated with improved outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD). However, most of the current data pertain to colonic MH and DR, whereas the evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of small bowel (SB) MH is scarce. The aim of this study was to to evaluate the prevalence of SBMH and DR in quiescent SBCD.
Patients with known SBCD in clinical remission (CDAI<150) or with mild symptoms (CDAI<220) were prospectively recruited and underwent video capsule endoscopy after verification of SB patency. Inflammation was quantified using the Lewis score (LS). SBMH was defined as LS<135, whereas a significant inflammation was defined as LS>790. Clinico-biomarker remission was defined as a combination of clinical remission and normal biomarkers. DR was defined as a combination of clinico-biomarker remission and MH.
Fifty-six patients with proven SB patency were enrolled; 52 (92.9%) patients were in clinical remission and 21 (40.4%) in clinico-biomarker remission. SBMH was demonstrated in 8/52 (15.4%) of patients in clinical remission. Moderate-to-severe SB inflammation was demonstrated in 11/52 (21.1%) of patients in clinical remission and in 1/21 (4.7%) of patients in clinical and biomarker remission. Only 7/52 (13.5%) patients were in DR.
SB inflammation is detected in the majority of CD patients in clinical and biomarker remission. SBMH and DR were rare and were independent of treatment modality. Our findings represent the true inflammatory burden in quiescent patients with SBCD.
黏膜愈合(MH)和深度缓解(DR)与克罗恩病(CD)预后改善相关。然而,目前大多数数据涉及结肠MH和DR,而关于小肠(SB)MH的患病率及影响的证据却很少。本研究的目的是评估静止期小肠CD(SBCD)中SB MH和DR的患病率。
前瞻性招募临床缓解(CDAI<150)或有轻度症状(CDAI<220)的已知SBCD患者,在确认SB通畅后进行视频胶囊内镜检查。使用Lewis评分(LS)对炎症进行量化。SB MH定义为LS<135,而显著炎症定义为LS>790。临床生物标志物缓解定义为临床缓解和生物标志物正常的组合。DR定义为临床生物标志物缓解和MH的组合。
纳入56例经证实SB通畅的患者;52例(92.9%)患者处于临床缓解,21例(40.4%)处于临床生物标志物缓解。8/52例(15.4%)临床缓解患者存在SB MH。11/52例(21.1%)临床缓解患者及1/21例(4.7%)临床和生物标志物缓解患者存在中重度SB炎症。仅7/52例(13.5%)患者处于DR状态。
大多数临床和生物标志物缓解的CD患者存在SB炎症。SB MH和DR很少见,且与治疗方式无关。我们的研究结果代表了静止期SBCD患者真正的炎症负担。