• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱评分

Frailty scoring in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

作者信息

Hinterbuchner Lynne, Strohmer Bernhard, Hammerer Matthias, Prinz Erika, Hoppe Uta C, Schernthaner Christiana

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Salzburg, Austria

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Oct;15(6):384-97. doi: 10.1177/1474515115596640. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/1474515115596640
PMID:26216870
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive treatment option for patients that are deemed too high a risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The aim of this review is to evaluate the frailty tools currently being used in patients referred for TAVR.

METHODS

Using a literature search involving database search engines from CINAHL, PubMed, SAGE publications and European Society of Cardiology conducted from 2010 to the present, a critical evaluation of studies dealing with frailty assessment in patients referred for TAVR/SAVR is discussed.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the criteria using frailty assessment in TAVR/SAVR patients. In all reviewed studies the impact of frailty on clinical outcome has been proved. Different instruments for measurements of frailty were used that have not been robustly evaluated. Frailty was defined differently and results may not be comparable. All reviewed studies used different cutoffs and scales and some a composite scoring system, although validity was limited.

CONCLUSION

For frailty assessment implementation of validated standardized test protocols based on well-established assessment tools, covering all domains of frailty among TAVR centers is crucial for patient selection. Secondly, validated cutoffs and scoring systems are essential.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是一种侵入性较小的治疗选择,适用于那些被认为进行外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)风险过高的患者。本综述的目的是评估目前在接受TAVR治疗的患者中使用的虚弱评估工具。

方法

通过对2010年至今从CINAHL、PubMed、SAGE出版物和欧洲心脏病学会的数据库搜索引擎进行文献检索,讨论了对接受TAVR/SAVR治疗的患者进行虚弱评估的研究的批判性评价。

结果

八项研究符合在TAVR/SAVR患者中使用虚弱评估的标准。在所有综述研究中,虚弱对临床结局的影响已得到证实。使用了不同的虚弱测量工具,但尚未进行充分评估。虚弱的定义不同,结果可能无法比较。所有综述研究都使用了不同的临界值和量表,有些使用了综合评分系统,尽管有效性有限。

结论

对于虚弱评估,基于成熟评估工具实施经过验证的标准化测试方案,涵盖TAVR中心虚弱的所有领域,对于患者选择至关重要。其次,经过验证的临界值和评分系统至关重要。

相似文献

1
Frailty scoring in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱评分
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Oct;15(6):384-97. doi: 10.1177/1474515115596640. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.老年主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱:FRAILTY-AVR 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Comparison of Short and Mid-Term Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (Intermediate/High Risk) Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.对比行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(中危/高危)患者的短期及中期死亡率和发病率。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Apr 15;23(2):E212-E220. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2913.
4
Preoperative frailty affects postoperative complications, exercise capacity, and home discharge rates after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.术前衰弱会影响手术后并发症、运动能力和经手术及经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的家庭出院率。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Aug;36(8):1234-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01793-3. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗高危主动脉瓣狭窄合并左心室功能不全患者的疗效:主动脉经导管瓣膜置入(PARTNER)试验(A队列)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(6):604-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000650. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者的结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195742. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742.
7
A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.中高危手术患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较研究:医院结局和中期结果
Heart Surg Forum. 2019 Aug 27;22(5):E331-E339. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2243.
8
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Impact of preoperative moderate/severe mitral regurgitation on 2-year outcome after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insight from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial Cohort A.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术 2 年后中重度二尖瓣反流对预后的影响:来自经导管主动脉瓣置换术(PARTNER)试验队列 A 的观察。
Circulation. 2013 Dec 24;128(25):2776-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003885. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with interstitial lung disease.间质性肺疾病患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
J Card Surg. 2020 Mar;35(3):571-579. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14421. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Frailty Assessments for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Real-World Evidence Study.利用结构化和非结构化数据增强经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的脆弱性评估:真实世界证据研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 27;7:e58980. doi: 10.2196/58980.
2
Exercise-based real-time telerehabilitation for older patients recently discharged after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An extended feasibility study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后近期出院的老年患者基于运动的实时远程康复:一项扩展可行性研究。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Nov 28;20(11):767-778. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.11.003.
3
Malnutrition Predicts Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
营养不良预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 May;27(5):240-248. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.2710.
4
A Risk Model for 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the J-TVT Registry.基于J-TVT注册研究的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年死亡率风险模型
JACC Asia. 2022 Oct 4;2(5):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.06.002. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Exercise-Based Real-time Telerehabilitation for Older Adult Patients Recently Discharged After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后近期出院的老年患者基于运动的实时远程康复:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Apr 26;9(2):e34819. doi: 10.2196/34819.
6
Frailty-aware care: giving value to frailty assessment across different healthcare settings.衰弱感知护理:在不同医疗保健环境中重视衰弱评估。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02722-9.
7
Frailty in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from risk scores to frailty-based management.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱:从风险评分到基于衰弱的管理
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Jun 28;18(6):479-486. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.06.002.
8
Frailty and Exercise Training: How to Provide Best Care after Cardiac Surgery or Intervention for Elder Patients with Valvular Heart Disease.衰弱与运动训练:老年瓣膜性心脏病患者心脏手术后或介入治疗后如何提供最佳护理。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 13;2018:9849475. doi: 10.1155/2018/9849475. eCollection 2018.
9
The association between renal recovery after acute kidney injury and long-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.急性肾损伤后肾功能恢复与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后长期死亡率之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183350. eCollection 2017.
10
Association of frailty status with acute kidney injury and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后衰弱状态与急性肾损伤及死亡率的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177157. eCollection 2017.