Lopes M, Leite F L, Valente B S, Heres T, Dai Prá M A, Xavier E G, Roll V F B
Federal University of Pelotas, Faculty of Agronomy Eliseu Maciel, Department of Animal Science, 354, 96010-900 Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Federal University of Pelotas, Biotechnology Center, 354, 96010-900 Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Poult Sci. 2015 Sep;94(9):2094-8. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev195. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Although the use of quicklime (CaO) and tarping are common handling practices aimed at the reuse of litter in the Brazilian poultry industry, few scientific studies have proven the effectiveness of these methods in reducing the pathogenic microbial load during fallowing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the following litter treatments: T1 no treatment (control), T2 quicklime (300 g m(-2)), T3 tarping, T4 tarping+quicklime (300 g m(-2)). The litter samples were collected on day zero and on the sixth and twelfth days after the start of fallowing. The use of quicklime alone or quicklime+tarping was more effective (P<0.05) in reducing bacteria when compared to litter tarping. Except for the control group, all treatments resulted in a more than 84% reduction in the count of colony-forming units (CFUs) at the end of fallowing. It is concluded that the use of quicklime alone in practical terms is the most indicated treatment for the reduction of the bacterial load of poultry litter.
虽然在巴西家禽业中,使用生石灰(CaO)和覆盖是旨在重复利用垫料的常见处理方法,但很少有科学研究证明这些方法在休耕期减少病原微生物负荷方面的有效性。本研究的目的是评估以下垫料处理方式:T1不处理(对照),T2生石灰(300 g m(-2)),T3覆盖,T4覆盖+生石灰(300 g m(-2))。在休耕开始后的第0天、第6天和第12天采集垫料样本。与垫料覆盖相比,单独使用生石灰或生石灰+覆盖在减少细菌方面更有效(P<0.05)。除对照组外,所有处理在休耕结束时均使菌落形成单位(CFU)计数减少超过84%。得出的结论是,实际上单独使用生石灰是减少家禽垫料细菌负荷的最适宜处理方法。