De Oliveira Gildasio S, Kendall Mark C, Marcus R-Jay, McCarthy Robert J
Department of Anesthesiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 251 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9745-0. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Prior studies have examined the static effect of intravenous ketamine on the BIS Index for sedation but it remains unknown if the BIS Index is a reliable method to track sedation levels in the presence of ketamine. The major objective of the current investigation was to compare the BIS Vista Index ability to track varying depths of sedation as determined by OASS scores in a standardized anesthetic regimen with and without ketamine. The study was a randomized, double blinded clinical trial. Patients undergoing breast surgery under sedation with propofol were randomized to receive ketamine (1.5 μg kg min(-1)) or saline. Infusion data was used to estimate propofol plasma concentrations (Cp). The main outcome of interest was the correlation between the BIS Vista Index with the OASS score. Twenty subjects were recruited and fifteen completed the study. Four hundred fifty-five paired data points were included in the analysis. Model performance (Nagelkerke R(2)) of the multinomial logistic regression model was 0.57 with the c-statistic of 0.87 (95 % CI 0.82-0.91). Compared to awake the odds ratio for BIS values predicting moderate sedation in the saline/propofol group 1.19 (95 % CI 1.12-1.25) but only 1.06 (95 % CI 1.02-1.1) in the ketamine/propofol group (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the odds for BIS values to predict deep sedation between groups (P = 0.14). The BIS monitor can be used to monitor sedation level even when ketamine is used with propofol as part of the sedation regimen. However, ketamine reduces the value of the BIS in predicting moderate sedation levels.
先前的研究已经考察了静脉注射氯胺酮对脑电双频指数(BIS)用于镇静的静态影响,但在氯胺酮存在的情况下,BIS指数是否是追踪镇静水平的可靠方法仍不清楚。当前研究的主要目的是比较在标准化麻醉方案中,有或没有氯胺酮时,BIS Vista指数追踪由麻醉深度评分系统(OASS)评分所确定的不同镇静深度的能力。该研究是一项随机、双盲临床试验。接受丙泊酚镇静下行乳房手术的患者被随机分为接受氯胺酮(1.5μg·kg·min⁻¹)或生理盐水组。输注数据用于估计丙泊酚血浆浓度(Cp)。主要关注的结果是BIS Vista指数与OASS评分之间的相关性。招募了20名受试者,15名完成了研究。分析中纳入了455对数据点。多项逻辑回归模型的模型性能(Nagelkerke R²)为0.57,c统计量为0.87(95%CI 0.82 - 0.91)。与清醒状态相比,生理盐水/丙泊酚组中BIS值预测中度镇静的优势比为1.19(95%CI 1.12 - 1.25),但氯胺酮/丙泊酚组仅为1.06(95%CI 1.02 - 1.1)(P = 0.001)。两组之间BIS值预测深度镇静的优势没有差异(P = 0.14)。即使氯胺酮与丙泊酚一起作为镇静方案的一部分使用时,BIS监测仪也可用于监测镇静水平。然而,氯胺酮会降低BIS在预测中度镇静水平时的价值。