Riesgo Aldo M, Hochfelder Jason P, Adler Edward M, Slover James D, Specht Lawrence M, Iorio Richard
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center-Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York.
Boston University School of Medicine, Lahey Clinic Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2260-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.037. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.
我们回顾性分析了两个学术医疗中心的十位外科医生进行的161例采用骨干适配、中置模块化股骨组件的翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)。平均随访时间为6.1年。在末次随访时,4例患者因股骨组件失败需要再次翻修;3例(2%)因无菌性松动,1例因假体周围骨折时假体柄的机械性失败。因任何原因进行的翻修共有24例(14.9%),最常见的原因是感染性失败(24例中的10例)。据我们所知,这是已报道的关于采用中置模块化股骨组件的翻修THA中期生存率和并发症的最大系列研究。我们的结果表明,这些假体柄无菌性松动、下沉和机械性失败的发生率较低。