Suppr超能文献

公众获取除颤器:大有益处且潜力巨大,但使用频率低。

Public Access Defibrillation: Great benefit and potential but infrequently used.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; The Emergency Medical Services, The Capital Region of Denmark and Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Copenhagen, a volunteer-based Automated External Defibrillator (AED) network provides a unique opportunity to assess AED use. We aimed to determine the proportion of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) where an AED was applied before arrival of the ambulance, and the proportion of OHCA-cases where an accessible AED was located within 100 m. In addition, we assessed 30-day survival.

METHODS

Using data from the Mobile Emergency Care Unit and the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry, we identified 521 patients with OHCA between October 1, 2011 and September 31, 2013 in Copenhagen, Denmark.

RESULTS

An AED was applied in 20 cases (3.8%, 95% CI [2.4 to 5.9]). Irrespective of AED accessibility, an AED was located within 100 m of a cardiac arrest in 23.4% (n=102, 95% CI [19.5 to 27.7]) of all OHCAs. However, at the time of OHCA, an AED was located within 100 m and accessible in only 15.1% (n=66, 95% CI [11.9 to 18.9]) of all cases. The 30-day survival for OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm was 64% for patients where an AED was applied prior to ambulance arrival and 47% for patients where an AED was not applied.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 3.8% of all OHCAs had an AED applied prior to ambulance arrival, but 15.1% of all OHCAs occurred within 100 m of an accessible AED. This indicates the potential of utilising AED networks by improving strategies for AED accessibility and referring bystanders of OHCA to existing AEDs.

摘要

背景

在哥本哈根,一个志愿者为基础的自动体外除颤器(AED)网络提供了一个独特的机会来评估 AED 的使用情况。我们的目的是确定在救护车到达之前使用 AED 的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的比例,以及在 100 米范围内可获得 AED 的 OHCA 病例的比例。此外,我们评估了 30 天的生存率。

方法

使用移动急救单元和丹麦心脏骤停登记处的数据,我们确定了 2011 年 10 月 1 日至 2013 年 9 月 31 日期间哥本哈根的 521 例 OHCA 患者。

结果

有 20 例(3.8%,95%CI[2.4 至 5.9])使用了 AED。无论 AED 是否可及,在所有 OHCA 中,AED 都位于距离心脏骤停 100 米以内的地方,占 23.4%(n=102,95%CI[19.5 至 27.7])。然而,在 OHCA 发生时,只有 15.1%(n=66,95%CI[11.9 至 18.9])的病例 AED 位于 100 米以内且可使用。初始可除颤节律的 OHCA 患者中,在救护车到达之前应用 AED 的患者 30 天生存率为 64%,未应用 AED 的患者为 47%。

结论

我们发现,所有 OHCA 中有 3.8%在救护车到达之前使用了 AED,但所有 OHCA 中有 15.1%发生在可获得 AED 的 100 米范围内。这表明通过改善 AED 可及性策略和将 OHCA 的旁观者转介到现有的 AED,可以利用 AED 网络。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验