Hoffman Steven J, Tan Charlie
Global Strategy Lab, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, 57 Louis Pasteur Street, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, ON, Canada.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics and McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 5;15:744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2041-6.
Government interventions are critical to addressing the global tobacco epidemic, a major public health problem that continues to deepen. We systematically synthesize research evidence on the effectiveness of government tobacco control policies promoted by the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), supporting the implementation of this international treaty on the tenth anniversary of it entering into force.
An overview of systematic reviews was prepared through systematic searches of five electronic databases, published up to March 2014. Additional reviews were retrieved from monthly updates until August 2014, consultations with tobacco control experts and a targeted search for reviews on mass media interventions. Reviews were assessed according to predefined inclusion criteria, and ratings of methodological quality were either extracted from source databases or independently scored.
Of 612 reviews retrieved, 45 reviews met the inclusion criteria and 14 more were identified from monthly updates, expert consultations and a targeted search, resulting in 59 included reviews summarizing over 1150 primary studies. The 38 strong and moderate quality reviews published since 2000 were prioritized in the qualitative synthesis. Protecting people from tobacco smoke was the most strongly supported government intervention, with smoke-free policies associated with decreased smoking behaviour, secondhand smoke exposure and adverse health outcomes. Raising taxes on tobacco products also consistently demonstrated reductions in smoking behaviour. Tobacco product packaging interventions and anti-tobacco mass media campaigns may decrease smoking behaviour, with the latter likely an important part of larger multicomponent programs. Financial interventions for smoking cessation are most effective when targeted at smokers to reduce the cost of cessation products, but incentivizing quitting may be effective as well. Although the findings for bans on tobacco advertising were inconclusive, other evidence suggests they remain an important intervention.
When designing and implementing tobacco control programs, governments should prioritize smoking bans and price increases of tobacco products followed by other interventions. Additional studies are needed on the various factors that can influence a policy's effectiveness and feasibility such as cost, local context, political barriers and implementation strategies.
政府干预对于应对全球烟草流行这一持续加剧的重大公共卫生问题至关重要。我们系统地综合了关于《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)所推动的政府烟草控制政策有效性的研究证据,以支持该国际条约在生效十周年之际的实施。
通过对截至2014年3月发表的五个电子数据库进行系统检索,编写了系统评价概述。从每月更新中检索其他评价,直至2014年8月,与烟草控制专家进行磋商,并针对性地搜索关于大众媒体干预的评价。根据预先确定的纳入标准对评价进行评估,方法学质量评分要么从源数据库中提取,要么独立评分。
在检索到的612篇评价中,45篇评价符合纳入标准,通过每月更新、专家磋商和针对性搜索又确定了14篇,最终有59篇纳入评价,总结了1150多项原始研究。2000年以来发表的38篇高质量和中等质量评价被优先纳入定性综合分析。保护人们免受烟草烟雾危害是最受支持的政府干预措施,无烟政策与吸烟行为减少、二手烟暴露及不良健康后果减少相关。提高烟草产品税收也始终显示出吸烟行为的减少。烟草产品包装干预措施和反烟草大众媒体宣传活动可能会减少吸烟行为,后者可能是更大规模多成分项目的重要组成部分。针对吸烟者以降低戒烟产品成本的戒烟财政干预措施最为有效,但激励戒烟也可能有效。尽管关于烟草广告禁令的研究结果尚无定论,但其他证据表明它们仍然是一项重要干预措施。
在设计和实施烟草控制项目时,政府应优先考虑实施吸烟禁令和提高烟草产品价格,随后再采取其他干预措施。还需要对可能影响政策有效性和可行性的各种因素进行更多研究,如成本、当地情况、政治障碍和实施策略等。