• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过健康干预措施惠及贫困人口:对亚洲和非洲七项妇女团体降低新生儿死亡率随机试验的项目发生率分析

Reaching the poor with health interventions: programme-incidence analysis of seven randomised trials of women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in Asia and Africa.

作者信息

Houweling Tanja A J, Morrison Joanna, Alcock Glyn, Azad Kishwar, Das Sushmita, Hossen Munir, Kuddus Abdul, Lewycka Sonia, Looman Caspar W, Magar Bharat Budhathoki, Manandhar Dharma S, Akter Mahfuza, Dube Albert Lazarous Nkhata, Rath Shibanand, Saville Naomi, Sen Aman, Tripathy Prasanta, Costello Anthony

机构信息

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):31-41. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204685. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2014-204685
PMID:26246540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4717375/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts to end preventable newborn deaths will fail if the poor are not reached with effective interventions. To understand what works to reach vulnerable groups, we describe and explain the uptake of a highly effective community-based newborn health intervention across social strata in Asia and Africa.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of seven randomised trials of participatory women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Malawi. We analysed data on 70,574 pregnancies. Socioeconomic and sociodemographic differences in group attendance were tested using logistic regression. Qualitative data were collected at each trial site (225 focus groups, 20 interviews) to understand our results.

RESULTS

Socioeconomic differences in women's group attendance were small, except for occasional lower attendance by elites. Sociodemographic differences were large, with lower attendance by young primigravid women in African as well as in South Asian sites. The intervention was considered relevant and interesting to all socioeconomic groups. Local facilitators ensured inclusion of poorer women. Embarrassment and family constraints on movement outside the home restricted attendance among primigravid women. Reproductive health discussions were perceived as inappropriate for them.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based women's groups can help to reach every newborn with effective interventions. Equitable intervention uptake is enhanced when facilitators actively encourage all women to attend, organise meetings at the participants' convenience and use approaches that are easily understandable for the less educated. Focused efforts to include primigravid women are necessary, working with families and communities to decrease social taboos.

摘要

背景

如果未能为贫困人口提供有效的干预措施,那么终结可预防的新生儿死亡的努力将会失败。为了解何种措施有助于覆盖弱势群体,我们描述并解释了一项基于社区的高效新生儿健康干预措施在亚洲和非洲不同社会阶层中的推广情况。

方法

我们对印度、孟加拉国、尼泊尔和马拉维开展的七项关于参与式妇女团体以降低新生儿死亡率的随机试验进行了二次分析。我们分析了70574例妊娠的数据。使用逻辑回归检验团体参与率在社会经济和社会人口统计学方面的差异。在每个试验地点收集定性数据(225个焦点小组,20次访谈)以理解我们的研究结果。

结果

妇女团体参与率在社会经济方面的差异较小,只是精英群体偶尔参与率较低。社会人口统计学方面的差异较大,在非洲以及南亚地区,年轻初产妇的参与率较低。该干预措施被认为对所有社会经济群体都具有相关性和吸引力。当地的协调员确保了贫困妇女的参与。尴尬以及家庭对出门活动的限制使得初产妇参与率较低。生殖健康讨论被认为对她们不合适。

结论

基于社区的妇女团体有助于通过有效的干预措施覆盖每一位新生儿。当协调员积极鼓励所有妇女参与、在参与者方便的时候组织会议并采用教育程度较低者易于理解的方法时,干预措施的公平推广会得到加强。有必要集中力量让初产妇参与进来,与家庭和社区合作以减少社会禁忌。

相似文献

1
Reaching the poor with health interventions: programme-incidence analysis of seven randomised trials of women's groups to reduce newborn mortality in Asia and Africa.通过健康干预措施惠及贫困人口:对亚洲和非洲七项妇女团体降低新生儿死亡率随机试验的项目发生率分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):31-41. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204685. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
2
Exploring the equity impact of a maternal and newborn health intervention: a qualitative study of participatory women's groups in rural South Asia and Africa.探索母婴健康干预措施的公平影响:对南亚和非洲农村参与式妇女团体的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Apr 11;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0957-7.
3
The equity impact of community women's groups to reduce neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of four cluster randomized trials.社区妇女团体对降低新生儿死亡率的公平影响:四项群组随机试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):168-182. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx160.
4
Effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action on preventive and care-seeking behaviours to reduce neonatal mortality: A meta-analysis of cluster-randomised trials.妇女团体开展参与式学习与行动对降低新生儿死亡率的预防及就医行为的影响:群组随机试验的荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Dec 5;14(12):e1002467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002467. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the community effectiveness of two interventions in rural Malawi to improve health care and to reduce maternal, newborn and infant mortality.一项在马拉维农村地区开展的针对两种干预措施的社区效果的整群随机对照试验,旨在改善医疗保健并降低孕产妇、新生儿和婴儿死亡率。
Trials. 2010 Sep 17;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-88.
7
The effect of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Bangladesh: does coverage matter? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.参与式妇女团体对孟加拉国分娩结局的影响:覆盖率是否重要?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Sep 26;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-208.
8
Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates: evidence on Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups in eastern India.社会经济不平等与死产率和新生儿死亡率:印度东部特别脆弱部落群体的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 May 6;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01655-y.
9
Effect of scaling up women's groups on birth outcomes in three rural districts in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.孟加拉国三个农村地区扩大妇女组织对生育结果的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 Apr 3;375(9721):1193-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60142-0. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
10
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇女组织开展参与式学习和行动,以改善资源匮乏环境中的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cluster randomised controlled trial of a household-level, group preconception nutrition awareness and norm intervention (SUMADHUR) combined with multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) for newly married households: a protocol.一项针对新婚家庭的家庭层面、群体孕前营养意识与规范干预(SUMADHUR)联合多种微量营养素补充剂(MMS)的整群随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e103488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103488.
2
How did the context of COVID-19 affect the implementation and mechanisms of participatory learning and action to address type 2 diabetes? Mixed-methods research in rural Bangladesh.2019年冠状病毒病的背景如何影响参与式学习和行动以应对2型糖尿病的实施情况及机制?孟加拉国农村地区的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e089288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089288.
3
Life skills and reproductive health empowerment intervention for newly married women and their families to reduce unintended pregnancy in India: protocol for the TARANG cluster randomised controlled trial.新婚女性及其家庭生活技能和生殖健康赋权干预以减少印度意外妊娠的效果:TARANG 整群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 30;14(4):e086778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086778.
4
Assessing IRS performance in a gender-integrated vector control programme on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, 2010-2021.评估 2010-2021 年在赤道几内亚比奥科岛实施的性别融合病媒控制规划中的 IRS 绩效。
Malar J. 2023 Oct 25;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04755-4.
5
Impact of Sumadhur intervention on fertility and family planning decision-making norms: a mixed methods study.苏玛度干预对生育和计划生育决策规范的影响:混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 May 25;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01619-7.
6
The development and feasibility of a group-based household-level intervention to improve preconception nutrition in Nawalparasi district of Nepal.以群组为基础的家庭层面干预措施在尼泊尔纳瓦尔帕拉西县改善备孕营养的发展和可行性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12980-w.
7
Exploring change over time in community mobilization domains: results from a maternity waiting home intervention in rural Zambia.探索赞比亚农村地区母婴之家干预措施中社区动员领域随时间的变化:结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Oct 19;20(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01557-5.
8
Is patient navigation a solution to the problem of "leaving no one behind"? A scoping review of evidence from low-income countries.患者导航是解决“不让任何一个人掉队”问题的方法吗?对来自低收入国家的证据进行的范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 3;36(1):101-116. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa093.
9
Promoting women's and children's health through community groups in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review of mechanisms, enablers and barriers.通过低收入和中等收入国家的社区团体促进妇女和儿童健康:对机制、促进因素和障碍的混合方法系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 5;4(6):e001972. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001972. eCollection 2019.
10
Sustainability of community-based women's groups: reflections from a participatory intervention for newborn and maternal health in Nepal.基于社区的妇女团体的可持续性:尼泊尔新生儿与孕产妇健康参与式干预的反思
Community Dev J. 2019 Oct;54(4):731-749. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsy017. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of increased coverage of participatory women's groups on neonatal mortality in Bangladesh: A cluster randomized trial.参与式妇女小组覆盖率增加对孟加拉国新生儿死亡率的影响:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Sep;167(9):816-25. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2534.
2
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇女组织开展参与式学习和行动,以改善资源匮乏环境中的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
3
Community-based interventions for enhancing access to or consumption of fruit and vegetables among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review.社区为基础的干预措施对提高 5 至 18 岁儿童获得或消费水果和蔬菜的影响:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 30;12:711. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-711.
4
Community mobilization in Mumbai slums to improve perinatal care and outcomes: a cluster randomized controlled trial.孟买贫民窟的社区动员以改善围产期保健和结局:一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001257. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
5
Scaling up community mobilisation through women's groups for maternal and neonatal health: experiences from rural Bangladesh.通过妇女团体扩大社区动员,促进母婴健康:来自孟加拉国农村地区的经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jan 24;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-5.
6
The effect of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Bangladesh: does coverage matter? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.参与式妇女团体对孟加拉国分娩结局的影响:覆盖率是否重要?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Sep 26;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-208.
7
Community interventions to reduce child mortality in Dhanusha, Nepal: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.社区干预降低尼泊尔达努沙地区儿童死亡率:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Jun 3;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-136.
8
Behavior change for newborn survival in resource-poor community settings: bridging the gap between evidence and impact.资源匮乏社区环境下改善新生儿生存状况的行为转变:弥合证据与影响之间的差距。
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Dec;34(6):446-61. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.006.
9
Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation.解释妇女团体主导的社区动员干预对母婴健康结局的影响:Ekjut 试验过程评估。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Oct 22;10:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-25.
10
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the community effectiveness of two interventions in rural Malawi to improve health care and to reduce maternal, newborn and infant mortality.一项在马拉维农村地区开展的针对两种干预措施的社区效果的整群随机对照试验,旨在改善医疗保健并降低孕产妇、新生儿和婴儿死亡率。
Trials. 2010 Sep 17;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-88.