• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.西班牙21家顶尖医院对血糖监测系统的多中心性能评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 7;10(1):93-100. doi: 10.1177/1932296815598777.
2
Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.在医院环境中,使用ISO 15197:2013准确性标准、共识和监测误差网格分析以及胰岛素剂量误差建模对三种血糖监测系统进行性能评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 7;10(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/1932296815609368.
3
Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.血糖仪准确性和用户性能评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):152-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0129. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
4
Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.基于ISO 15197要求,对四种血糖仪在目标用户和经过培训人员手中的准确性评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Apr;19(4):246-254. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0341. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
5
Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision.三种血糖监测系统的分析性能评估:系统准确性、测量重复性和中间测量精密度。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):111-117. doi: 10.1177/1932296818804837. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Accuracy and user performance evaluation of the Contour(®) Next Link 2.4 blood glucose monitoring system.Contour(®) Next Link 2.4血糖监测系统的准确性及用户性能评估
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Aug 25;448:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Evaluation of Accuracy of Six Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Modeling of Possibly Related Insulin Dosing Errors.六种血糖监测系统准确性评估及相关胰岛素剂量错误建模。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Oct;19(10):580-588. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0408. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197.基于ISO 15197的血糖监测系统的系统准确性、中间测量精度和测量重复性评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Mar;13(2):235-241. doi: 10.1177/1932296818821105. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.四种血糖监测系统在低血糖范围内未改变血样及ISO 15197规定浓度范围内血样中的准确性评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):625-34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0043. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Accuracy of a blood glucose monitoring system that recognizes insufficient sample blood volume and allows application of more blood to the same test strip.一种血糖监测系统能够识别样本血量不足,并允许在同一条测试条上应用更多血液,从而提高了准确性。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Jan;17(1):75-82. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1704253. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.血糖仪检测系统的平均绝对相对差异及与 ISO 15197 的关系
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1089-1095. doi: 10.1177/19322968211001402. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.七年临床监测项目证明血糖测试条的平均相对偏差(MARD)准确性表现稳定。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Sep;12(5):1016-1023. doi: 10.1177/1932296818776668. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study to Evaluate Performance of the EXIMO™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System.一项评估EXIMO™血糖监测系统性能的上市后监测研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):FC29-FC32. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26596.9892. Epub 2017 May 1.
4
Requirements for Successful Adoption of a Glucose Measurement System Into a Hospital POC Program.将葡萄糖测量系统成功纳入医院即时检验项目的要求。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 28;10(4):947-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296816645363. Print 2016 Jul.
5
The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems.血糖自我监测(SMBG)系统分析性能评估中ISO 15197准确性标准与平均绝对相对差异(MARD)之间的定量关系
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1182-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296816644468. Print 2016 Sep.
6
Performance of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in a Point-of-Care Setting.血糖监测系统在即时护理环境中的性能
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 28;10(4):939-46. doi: 10.1177/1932296816638854. Print 2016 Jul.
7
Advances in Patient Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.患者血糖自我监测的进展
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Nov 29;10(1):101-3. doi: 10.1177/1932296815619183.
8
Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.在医院环境中,使用ISO 15197:2013准确性标准、共识和监测误差网格分析以及胰岛素剂量误差建模对三种血糖监测系统进行性能评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 7;10(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/1932296815609368.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.四种血糖监测系统在低血糖范围内未改变血样及ISO 15197规定浓度范围内血样中的准确性评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):625-34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0043. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.用于自我检测的12种血糖监测系统的评估:系统准确性和测量再现性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):113-22. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0208. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
4
A new test strip technology platform for self-monitoring of blood glucose.一种用于血糖自我监测的新型试纸技术平台。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1386-99. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700531.
5
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.五种血糖监测系统的准确性评估:北美比较试验
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1294-304. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700520.
6
Accuracy and reliability of continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison.连续血糖监测系统的准确性和可靠性:头对头比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Aug;15(8):722-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0049. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems.市售血糖监测系统之间准确性差异的临床意义及经济影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):365-80. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700213.
8
A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors.三种连续血糖监测仪的疗效比较分析。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):251-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0070. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.新血糖仪在预期使用者手中的性能表现。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Sep;14(9):783-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0046. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
10
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.从药房获得的五种血糖监测系统的准确性评估:一项涉及 453 名受试者的欧洲多中心研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Apr;14(4):330-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0170. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

西班牙21家顶尖医院对血糖监测系统的多中心性能评估

A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.

作者信息

Bedini José Luis, Wallace Jane F, Petruschke Thorsten, Pardo Scott

机构信息

Core Lab, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

Bayer HealthCare LLC, Medical Care, Mishawaka, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 7;10(1):93-100. doi: 10.1177/1932296815598777.

DOI:10.1177/1932296815598777
PMID:26253142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4738213/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-monitoring of blood glucose is crucial for the effective self-management of diabetes. The present study evaluated the accuracy of the Contour® XT blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) compared to the reference method in a large multicenter study under routine lab conditions at each hospital site.

METHODS

This study was conducted at 21 leading hospitals in Spain using leftover whole blood samples (n = 2100). Samples were tested with the BGMS using 1 commercial strip lot and the local laboratory hexokinase method. BGMS accuracy was assessed and results were compared to ISO 15197:2013 accuracy limit criteria and by using mean absolute relative difference analysis (MARD), consensus (Parkes) error grid (CEG), and surveillance error grid analyses (SEG).

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 2100 measurements from all sites showed that 99.43% of the BGMS results were within the ranges accepted by the accuracy limit criteria. The overall MARD was 3.85%. MARD was 4.47% for glucose concentrations < 70 mg/dL and 3.81% for concentrations of 70-300 mg/dL. In CEG, most results (99.8%) were within zone A ("no effect on clinical action"); the remaining ones (0.2%) were in zone B ("little to no effect on clinical action"). The SEG analysis showed that most of the results (98.4%) were in the "no risk" zone, with the remaining results in the "slight, lower" risk zone.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest multicenter study of Contour XT BGMS to date, and shows that this BGMS meets the ISO 15197:2013 accuracy limit criteria under local routine conditions in 21 leading Spanish hospitals.

摘要

背景

血糖自我监测对于糖尿病的有效自我管理至关重要。本研究在各医院站点的常规实验室条件下,通过一项大型多中心研究,评估了Contour® XT血糖监测系统(BGMS)与参考方法相比的准确性。

方法

本研究在西班牙的21家领先医院使用剩余的全血样本(n = 2100)进行。使用1个商业试纸批次,通过BGMS对样本进行检测,并采用当地实验室己糖激酶法。评估BGMS的准确性,并将结果与ISO 15197:2013准确性限值标准进行比较,同时采用平均绝对相对差分析(MARD)、一致性(帕克斯)误差网格(CEG)和监测误差网格分析(SEG)。

结果

对所有站点的2100次测量进行汇总分析表明,99.43%的BGMS结果在准确性限值标准所接受的范围内。总体MARD为3.85%。血糖浓度<70 mg/dL时MARD为4.47%,浓度为70 - 300 mg/dL时MARD为3.81%。在CEG中,大多数结果(99.8%)处于A区(“对临床行动无影响”);其余结果(0.2%)处于B区(“对临床行动几乎没有影响”)。SEG分析表明,大多数结果(98.4%)处于“无风险”区,其余结果处于“轻微、较低”风险区。

结论

这是迄今为止关于Contour XT BGMS的最大规模多中心研究,表明该BGMS在西班牙21家领先医院的当地常规条件下符合ISO 15197:2013准确性限值标准。