Suppr超能文献

多学科团队干预措施以优化急性护理环境中老年人的健康结局:一项系统评价。

Multidisciplinary team interventions to optimise health outcomes for older people in acute care settings: A systematic review.

作者信息

Hickman Louise D, Phillips Jane L, Newton Phillip J, Halcomb Elizabeth J, Al Abed Naser, Davidson Patricia M

机构信息

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Cardiovascular & Chronic Care, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;61(3):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A major challenge facing our health care systems internationally is managing the needs of increasing numbers of older people in hospital with chronic and complex conditions. A multidisciplinary approach is considered central to tailoring and targeting approaches to gerontological care, although this is often not realised in reality. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is seen as gold standard, though they are not readily available in many acute settings, compounded by the requirement for time, coordination of multidisciplinary specialties, and reimbursement issues. This systematic review aimed to identify multidisciplinary team interventions to optimise health outcomes for older people in acute care settings.

METHOD

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials reporting acute care multidisciplinary team based interventions, to improve care outcomes for hospitalised older people. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane and PsycINFO) were searched from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2014 in the English language. Data was extracted by two reviewers and checked by a third reviewer to resolve any conflicts.

RESULTS

Seven articles reporting RCTs met the systematic review inclusion criteria. The heterogeneity of study populations, multidisciplinary team interventions and outcome measures necessitated the use of narrative analysis. Three common elements of these studies included: (i) tailored treatment by clinicians with geriatric expertise (ii) a focus on transitional care interventions that enhance discharge planning; and (iii) communication an essential ingredient to improving care.

CONCLUSION

The tailoring of treatment, underpinned with clear communication strategies can reduce emergency department re-admission rates, mortality and functional decline of older people. Refining health professionals roles and responsibilities within transition models is an essential component that can improve health outcomes for older people in acute care settings.

摘要

背景

国际医疗保健系统面临的一项重大挑战是满足越来越多患有慢性和复杂疾病的住院老年人的需求。多学科方法被认为是定制和靶向老年护理方法的核心,尽管在现实中这一点往往难以实现。综合老年评估(CGA)被视为金标准,不过在许多急症环境中却难以获得,这因时间需求、多学科专科的协调以及报销问题而更加复杂。本系统评价旨在确定多学科团队干预措施,以优化急症护理环境中老年人的健康结局。

方法

对报告基于急症护理多学科团队干预措施以改善住院老年人护理结局的随机对照试验进行系统评价。从2000年1月1日至2014年7月1日以英文检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL(EBSCO)、Cochrane和PsycINFO)。由两名评审员提取数据,并由第三名评审员进行检查以解决任何冲突。

结果

七篇报告随机对照试验的文章符合系统评价纳入标准。研究人群、多学科团队干预措施和结局指标的异质性使得有必要采用叙述性分析。这些研究的三个共同要素包括:(i)由具有老年医学专业知识的临床医生进行定制治疗;(ii)注重加强出院计划的过渡性护理干预措施;以及(iii)沟通是改善护理的关键要素。

结论

以明确的沟通策略为支撑的定制治疗可降低急诊科再入院率、死亡率以及老年人的功能衰退。在过渡模式中明确卫生专业人员的角色和职责是改善急症护理环境中老年人健康结局的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验