Suppr超能文献

《利维坦》与肌动描记器:赫尔曼·亥姆霍兹关于神经刺激传播速度的“第二篇笔记”

Leviathan and the Myograph: Hermann Helmholtz's "Second Note" on the Propagation Speed of Nervous Stimulations.

作者信息

Schmidgen Henning

机构信息

Bauhaus-Universität WeimarGermanyE-mail:

出版信息

Sci Context. 2015 Sep;28(3):357-96. doi: 10.1017/S0269889715000174.

Abstract

In the winter of 1849-1850 in Königsberg, German physiologist Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894) conducted pioneering measurements concerning the propagation speed of stimulations in the living nerve. While recent historians of science have paid considerable attention to Helmholtz's uses of the graphic method, in particular his construction of an instrument called "myographion," this paper draws attention to the inscription surfaces that he used in effective ways for capturing and transmitting his findings. Against the background of recent archival findings, I show that Helmholtz used isinglass copies of his graphical recordings in order to communicate the basic principle of previous measurements to the academic public. As the correspondence with his Berlin-based friend and colleague Emil du Bois-Reymond (1818-1896) and the subsequent development of the myographion make clear, these curves were not meant as measurements but functioned as demonstrations. In other words, Helmholtz's curves did provide "images of precision" (Olesko and Holmes 1993) - but they were not precise images.

摘要

1849年至1850年冬,在德国柯尼斯堡,德国生理学家赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹(1821 - 1894)对活体神经中刺激的传播速度进行了开创性测量。尽管最近的科学史学家相当关注亥姆霍兹对图形法的运用,尤其是他构建的一种名为“肌动描记器”的仪器,但本文关注的是他有效用于捕捉和传达其研究结果的记录表面。基于最近的档案发现,我表明亥姆霍兹使用其图形记录的鱼胶复制品,以便向学术公众传达先前测量的基本原理。正如他与柏林的朋友兼同事埃米尔·杜·博伊斯 - 雷蒙德(1818 - 1896)的通信以及肌动描记器的后续发展所表明的,这些曲线并非作为测量结果,而是起到了演示的作用。换句话说,亥姆霍兹的曲线确实提供了“精确的图像”(奥莱斯科和霍姆斯,1993)——但它们并非精确的图像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验