Marshall Michelle, Jonsson Helgi, Helgadottir Gudrun P, Nicholls Elaine, van der Windt Danielle, Myers Helen, Dziedzic Krysia
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Landspitalinn University Hospital and University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun;66(6):828-36. doi: 10.1002/acr.22225.
To investigate the reliability and construct validity of an atlas for grading hand osteoarthritis (OA) on photographs in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort.
Participants were community-dwelling adults (ages ≥50 years) in North Staffordshire, UK with hand pain or hand problems in the last year who attended a research clinic. High-quality photographs were taken in a standardized position. A photographic atlas was used to score hand joints (second and third distal interphalangeal [DIP], second and third proximal interphalangeal [PIP], and first carpometacarpal [CMC] joints) and joint groups (DIP, PIP, and CMC joints) for OA on a 0-3 scale. Hand radiographs were graded for OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Clinical features (nodes, bony enlargement, and deformity) were determined by physical examination. Associations of photographic hand OA grades with radiographic OA and clinical features were determined to assess construct validity.
In total, 558 participants (mean age 64 years, 62% women) were included in the analyses. Reliability for scoring OA on the photographs was good (mean intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.77 and mean interrater ICC 0.71). At the joint level, photographic hand OA grade was positively associated with radiographic OA grade (Spearman's ρ = 0.19-0.57, P < 0.001) and the number of clinical features (Spearman's ρ = 0.36-0.59, P < 0.001). At the person level, individuals with higher global photographic OA scores had higher summed K/L scores and higher percentages meeting the American College of Rheumatology clinical hand OA criteria.
This photographic scoring system was reliable and a good indicator of hand OA in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort. This method of data collection offers researchers a feasible alternative to physical examination and radiography.
在一个与开发队列不同的、年龄较轻的社区居住人群中,研究用于根据手部照片对骨关节炎(OA)进行分级的图谱的可靠性和结构效度。
参与者为英国北斯塔福德郡社区居住的成年人(年龄≥50岁),他们在过去一年中出现手部疼痛或手部问题,并前往研究诊所就诊。在标准化位置拍摄高质量照片。使用摄影图谱对手部关节(第二和第三远侧指间关节[DIP]、第二和第三近侧指间关节[PIP]以及第一腕掌关节[CMC])和关节组(DIP、PIP和CMC关节)的OA进行0至3级评分。使用Kellgren/Lawrence(K/L)分级系统对手部X光片的OA进行分级。通过体格检查确定临床特征(结节、骨质增生和畸形)。确定摄影手部OA分级与X光片OA及临床特征之间的关联,以评估结构效度。
总计558名参与者(平均年龄64岁,62%为女性)纳入分析。照片上OA评分的可靠性良好(平均评分者内组内相关系数[ICC]为0.77,平均评分者间ICC为0.71)。在关节层面,摄影手部OA分级与X光片OA分级呈正相关(Spearman's ρ = 0.19 - 0.57,P < 0.001),与临床特征数量呈正相关(Spearman's ρ = 0.36 - 0.59,P < 0.001)。在个体层面,整体摄影OA评分较高的个体K/L总分较高,符合美国风湿病学会临床手部OA标准的百分比也较高。
这种摄影评分系统可靠,并且在一个与开发队列不同的、年龄较轻的社区居住人群中是手部OA的良好指标。这种数据收集方法为研究人员提供了一种可行的替代体格检查和X光检查的方法。