Landeweerd Laurens, Townend David, Mesman Jessica, Van Hoyweghen Ine
Radboud Univeriteit Nijmegen FNWI-ISIS & TUDelft, TNW-BT-BTS, PO box 9010, 6500, GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:8. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0026-y. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
In European science and technology policy, various styles have been developed and institutionalised to govern the ethical challenges of science and technology innovations. In this paper, we give an account of the most dominant styles of the past 30 years, particularly in Europe, seeking to show their specific merits and problems. We focus on three styles of governance: a technocratic style, an applied ethics style, and a public participation style. We discuss their merits and deficits, and use this analysis to assess the potential of the recently established governance approach of 'Responsible Research and Innovation' (RRI). Based on this analysis, we reflect on the current shaping of RRI in terms of 'doing governance'.
在欧洲的科技政策中,已形成并确立了各种方式来应对科技创新带来的伦理挑战。在本文中,我们阐述了过去30年中最为主要的方式,特别是在欧洲,旨在展现它们的具体优点和问题。我们聚焦于三种治理方式:技术官僚方式、应用伦理方式和公众参与方式。我们讨论了它们的优缺点,并利用这一分析来评估最近确立的“负责任的研究与创新”(RRI)治理方法的潜力。基于这一分析,我们从“开展治理”的角度反思了RRI目前的形成情况。