Soares Marcia Fatima, Ferreira Rachel Conceição, Pazzini Camila Alessandra, Travassos Denise Vieira, Paiva Saul Martins, e Ferreira Efigênia Ferreira
Student in Public Health at Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Av. Presidente Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
University Center Lavras, Rua Benjamin Constant, 33, Bairro Centro, ZIP Code 37200-000, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 12;15:775. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2113-7.
The empowerment embedded in the health area is defined as a process that can facilitate control over the determinants of health of individuals and population as a way to improve health. The aim of this study was to verify the association between individual and collective empowerment with sociodemographic conditions, lifestyle, health conditions and quality of life.
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 1150 individuals (aged 35 to 44 years). The empowerment was determined by questions from the Integrated Questionnaire for the Measurement of Social Capital (IQ-MSC). The quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref). Lifestyle and health conditions were obtained by adapted questions from the Fantastic Lifestyle Questionnaire The DMFT Index was incorporated in the health conditions questions. Logistic regression or multinomial regression was performed.
The practice of physical activity was related to individual (OR: 2.70) and collective (OR: 1.57) empowerment. Regarding individual empowerment, people with higher education level (5-11 years - OR: 3.46 and ≥12 years - OR: 4.41), who felt more able to deal with stress (OR:3.76), who presented a high score on quality of life (psychological domain) (OR:1.23) and that smoked (OR:1.49) were more likely to feel able to make decisions and participate in community activities. The increase in the DMFT Index represented less chance of individuals to feel more able to make decisions (OR: 0.96). Regarding the collective empowerment, being religious (catholic) (OR: 1.82), do not drink or drink just a little (OR: 1.66 and 2.28, respectively), and increased score of overall quality of life (OR: 1.08) were more likely to report that people cooperate to solve a problem in their community.
The two approaches to empowerment, the individual and collective are connected, and the physical activity showed to be a good strategy for the empowerment construction.
健康领域的赋权被定义为一个能够促进对个人和人群健康决定因素的控制从而改善健康状况的过程。本研究旨在验证个人和集体赋权与社会人口学状况、生活方式、健康状况及生活质量之间的关联。
对1150名年龄在35至44岁之间的个体进行了一项横断面分析研究。通过社会资本综合测量问卷(IQ-MSC)中的问题来确定赋权情况。使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL)来测量生活质量。生活方式和健康状况通过对《梦幻生活方式问卷》进行改编后的问题来获取。DMFT指数被纳入健康状况问题中。进行了逻辑回归或多项回归分析。
体育活动的实践与个人赋权(比值比:2.70)和集体赋权(比值比:1.57)相关。关于个人赋权,受过高等教育(5至11年 - 比值比:3.46,≥12年 - 比值比:4.41)、感觉更有能力应对压力(比值比:3.76)、在生活质量(心理领域)方面得分较高(比值比:1.23)以及吸烟(比值比:1.49)的人更有可能感觉有能力做出决策并参与社区活动。DMFT指数的增加表明个体感觉更有能力做出决策的可能性降低(比值比:0.96)。关于集体赋权,信教(天主教)(比值比:1.82)、不饮酒或少量饮酒(分别为比值比:1.66和2.28)以及生活质量总体得分增加(比值比:1.08)的人更有可能报告人们会合作解决社区中的问题。
个人和集体这两种赋权方式相互关联,体育活动被证明是赋权建设的一个良好策略。