Burtea Daniela Elena, Dimitriu Anca, Maloş Anca Elena, Săftoiu Adrian
Daniela Elena Burtea, Adrian Săftoiu, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200639 Craiova, Romania.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug 10;7(10):981-6. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.981.
Complex and lengthy endoscopic examinations like endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography benefit from deep sedation, due to an enhanced quality of examinations, reduced discomfort and anxiety of patients, as well as increased satisfaction for both the patients and medical personnel. Current guidelines support the use of propofol sedation, which has the same rate of adverse effects as traditional sedation with benzodiazepines and/or opioids, but decreases the procedural and recovery time. Non-anesthesiologist administered propofol sedation has become an option in most of the countries, due to limited anesthesiology resources and the increasing evidence from prospective studies and meta-analyses that the procedure is safe with a similar rate of adverse events with traditional sedation. The advantages include a high quality of endoscopic examination, improved satisfaction for patients and doctors, as well as decreased recovery and discharge time. Despite the advantages of non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, there is still a continuous debate related to the successful generalization of the procedures.
像超声内镜检查和/或内镜逆行胰胆管造影这样复杂而冗长的内镜检查,因检查质量提高、患者不适和焦虑减轻以及患者和医务人员满意度增加,而受益于深度镇静。当前指南支持使用丙泊酚镇静,其不良反应发生率与使用苯二氮䓬类药物和/或阿片类药物的传统镇静相同,但可缩短操作和恢复时间。由于麻醉学资源有限,且前瞻性研究和荟萃分析越来越多地证明该操作是安全的,不良事件发生率与传统镇静相似,因此在大多数国家,非麻醉医生实施丙泊酚镇静已成为一种选择。其优点包括内镜检查质量高、患者和医生满意度提高以及恢复和出院时间缩短。尽管非麻醉医生实施丙泊酚有诸多优点,但对于该操作能否成功推广仍存在持续的争论。