Oliveira D S, Cardoso M L, Queiroz T F, Silva E J N L, Souza E M, De-Deus G
Department of Endodontics, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2016 Aug;49(8):796-801. doi: 10.1111/iej.12519. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
To evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength of MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and iRoot SP (Innovative BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver, Canada) to the dentine walls of root canals. AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstaz, Germany) and MTA (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) were used as reference materials.
Sixty extracted human single-rooted teeth were selected. After standardized canal preparation and irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points and filled with one of four sealers: AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA and MTA Fillapex. Roots were sectioned, and push-out tests were performed. The values of bond strength were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction was used to isolate the differences. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05 for the analyses.
All specimens had measurable adhesion to root dentine and no premature failure occurred. There were significant differences amongst materials (P = 0.000). MTA-filled specimens had higher push-out bond strength values (P = 0.000). AH Plus had significantly higher bond strength than both Fillapex and iRoot SP (P = 0.000). Both Fillapex and iRoot SP had the lowest push-out bond strength amongst all experimental groups (P = 0.000). No difference occurred between the two calcium silicate-based root canal sealers (P = 0.265).
The adhesion to root dentine associated with newer calcium silicate-based sealers was compromised even when well-monitored laboratory conditions were used.
评估并比较MTA Fillapex(巴西隆德里纳安热卢斯公司)和iRoot SP(加拿大温哥华创新生物陶瓷公司)与根管牙本质壁之间的推出粘结强度。使用AH Plus(德国康斯坦茨登士柏德特雷公司)和MTA(巴西隆德里纳安热卢斯公司)作为对照材料。
选取60颗拔除的人单根牙。经过标准化的根管预备和冲洗后,用纸尖吸干根管,并使用四种封闭剂之一进行充填:AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA和MTA Fillapex。将牙根进行切片,并进行推出试验。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析粘结强度值。采用经Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney检验来区分差异。分析的α型错误设定为0.05。
所有标本对牙根牙本质均有可测量的附着力,且未发生早期失败。材料之间存在显著差异(P = 0.000)。MTA充填的标本具有更高的推出粘结强度值(P = 0.000)。AH Plus的粘结强度显著高于Fillapex和iRoot SP(P = 0.000)。在所有实验组中,Fillapex和iRoot SP的推出粘结强度最低(P = 0.000)。两种硅酸钙基根管封闭剂之间无差异(P = 0.265)。
即使在严格监控的实验室条件下,新型硅酸钙基封闭剂与牙根牙本质的附着力仍受到影响。